These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24205888)

  • 21. The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model.
    Rayner K; Ashby J; Pollatsek A; Reichle ED
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Aug; 30(4):720-32. PubMed ID: 15301620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lack of contextual-word predictability during reading in patients with mild Alzheimer disease.
    Fernández G; Manes F; Rotstein NP; Colombo O; Mandolesi P; Politi LE; Agamennoni O
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Sep; 62():143-51. PubMed ID: 25080188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. When experience meets language statistics: Individual variability in processing English compound words.
    Falkauskas K; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1607-27. PubMed ID: 26076328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Saccade launch site as a predictor of fixation durations in reading: comments on Hand, Miellet, O'Donnell, and Sereno (2010).
    Slattery TJ; Staub A; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):251-61. PubMed ID: 22082213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of aging, word frequency, and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye movements.
    Warrington KL; McGowan VA; Paterson KB; White SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1714-1729. PubMed ID: 29672115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diagnosis of mild Alzheimer disease through the analysis of eye movements during reading.
    Fernández G; Castro LR; Schumacher M; Agamennoni OE
    J Integr Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 14(1):121-33. PubMed ID: 25728469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: differential effects of frequency and predictability.
    Ashby J; Rayner K; Clifton C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Aug; 58(6):1065-86. PubMed ID: 16194948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006).
    Rayner K; Pollatsek A; Drieghe D; Slattery TJ; Reichle ED
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):520-9; discussion 530-7. PubMed ID: 17696697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Limits on lexical prediction during reading.
    Luke SG; Christianson K
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Aug; 88():22-60. PubMed ID: 27376659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lexical predictability exerts robust effects on fixation duration, but not on initial landing position during reading.
    Vainio S; Hyönä J; Pajunen A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 19261580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimating the effect of word predictability on eye movements in Chinese reading using latent semantic analysis and transitional probability.
    Wang HC; Pomplun M; Chen M; Ko H; Rayner K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1374-86. PubMed ID: 19998069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development of parafoveal processing within and across words in reading: evidence from the boundary paradigm.
    Häikiö T; Bertram R; Hyönä J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1982-98. PubMed ID: 20336584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Eye movements during reading of randomly shuffled text.
    Schad DJ; Nuthmann A; Engbert R
    Vision Res; 2010 Nov; 50(23):2600-16. PubMed ID: 20719240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Linguistic processes do not beat visuo-motor constraints, but they modulate where the eyes move regardless of word boundaries: Evidence against top-down word-based eye-movement control during reading.
    Albrengues C; Lavigne F; Aguilar C; Castet E; Vitu F
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219666. PubMed ID: 31329614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Parafoveal processing in reading.
    Schotter ER; Angele B; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 22042596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.
    Yan M; Kliegl R; Shu H; Pan J; Zhou X
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 20731511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Words in Context: The Effects of Length, Frequency, and Predictability on Brain Responses During Natural Reading.
    Schuster S; Hawelka S; Hutzler F; Kronbichler M; Richlan F
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3889-3904. PubMed ID: 27365297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of word frequency and word predictability during first- and second-language paragraph reading in bilingual older and younger adults.
    Whitford V; Titone D
    Psychol Aging; 2017 Mar; 32(2):158-177. PubMed ID: 28287786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading.
    Schotter ER; Bicknell K; Howard I; Levy R; Rayner K
    Cognition; 2014 Apr; 131(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 24434024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.