490 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24206154)
1. Too much small talk? Medical students' pelvic examination skills falter with pleasant patients.
Posner GD; Hamstra SJ
Med Educ; 2013 Dec; 47(12):1209-14. PubMed ID: 24206154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trained lay observers can reliably assess medical students' communication skills.
Bergus GR; Woodhead JC; Kreiter CD
Med Educ; 2009 Jul; 43(7):688-94. PubMed ID: 19573193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do medical students respond empathetically to a virtual patient?
Deladisma AM; Cohen M; Stevens A; Wagner P; Lok B; Bernard T; Oxendine C; Schumacher L; Johnsen K; Dickerson R; Raij A; Wells R; Duerson M; Harper JG; Lind DS;
Am J Surg; 2007 Jun; 193(6):756-60. PubMed ID: 17512291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Communication skills in standardized-patient assessment of final-year medical students: a psychometric study.
Guiton G; Hodgson CS; Delandshere G; Wilkerson L
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2004; 9(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 15316269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessors for communication skills: SPs or healthcare professionals?
Liew SC; Dutta S; Sidhu JK; De-Alwis R; Chen N; Sow CF; Barua A
Med Teach; 2014 Jul; 36(7):626-31. PubMed ID: 24787534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning intimate examinations with simulated patients: the evaluation of medical students' performance.
Hendrickx K; De Winter B; Tjalma W; Avonts D; Peeraer G; Wyndaele JJ
Med Teach; 2009 Apr; 31(4):e139-47. PubMed ID: 19404886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing medical students' communication skills by the use of standardized patients: emphasizing standardized patients' quality assurance.
Shirazi M; Labaf A; Monjazebi F; Jalili M; Mirzazadeh M; Ponzer S; Masiello I
Acad Psychiatry; 2014 Jun; 38(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 24777713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technical skills acquisition in surgery-bound senior medical students: an evaluation of student assertiveness.
Talbott VA; Marks JA; Bodzin AS; Comeau JA; Maxwell PJ; Isenberg GA; Martin ND
J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(4):529-35. PubMed ID: 22677593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing students' communication and interpersonal skills across evaluation settings.
Chessman AW; Blue AV; Gilbert GE; Carey M; Mainous AG
Fam Med; 2003 Oct; 35(9):643-8. PubMed ID: 14523662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Students' views on the use of real patients and simulated patients in undergraduate medical education.
Bokken L; Rethans JJ; van Heurn L; Duvivier R; Scherpbier A; van der Vleuten C
Acad Med; 2009 Jul; 84(7):958-63. PubMed ID: 19550197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Longitudinal effects of medical students' communication skills on future performance.
Dong T; LaRochelle JS; Durning SJ; Saguil A; Swygert K; Artino AR
Mil Med; 2015 Apr; 180(4 Suppl):24-30. PubMed ID: 25850123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Teaching pelvic examination technique using professional patients: a controlled study evaluating students' skills.
Wånggren K; Fianu Jonassen A; Andersson S; Pettersson G; Gemzell-Danielsson K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Oct; 89(10):1298-303. PubMed ID: 20846063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of simulated patients for assessment of communication skills in undergraduate medical education in obstetrics and gynaecology.
Jabeen D
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Jan; 23(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 23286617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can standardized patients replace physicians as OSCE examiners?
McLaughlin K; Gregor L; Jones A; Coderre S
BMC Med Educ; 2006 Feb; 6():12. PubMed ID: 16504145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the gender of the standardised patient influence candidate performance in an objective structured clinical examination?
Humphrey-Murto S; Touchie C; Wood TJ; Smee S
Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):521-5. PubMed ID: 19493175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Medical Student Communication Skills Measured by Standardized Patients During an OSCE and by Faculty During an In-Hospital Encounter.
Lacy M; Noronha L; Leyva Y; Pierce JR
South Med J; 2019 Feb; 112(2):70-75. PubMed ID: 30708368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. LUCAS: a theoretically informed instrument to assess clinical communication in objective structured clinical examinations.
Huntley CD; Salmon P; Fisher PL; Fletcher I; Young B
Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 46(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 22324526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learning to listen: effects of using conversational transcripts to help medical students improve their use of open questions in soliciting patient problems.
Tsai MH; Lu FH; Frankel RM
Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Oct; 93(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23683340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination.
Srinivasan M; Hauer KE; Der-Martirosian C; Wilkes M; Gesundheit N
Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 17727526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing students' communication skills: validation of a global rating.
Scheffer S; Muehlinghaus I; Froehmel A; Ortwein H
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):583-92. PubMed ID: 17636371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
