These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24206200)

  • 1. Design and evaluation of steering protection for avoiding collisions during a lane change.
    Itoh M; Inagaki T
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(3):361-73. PubMed ID: 24206200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness and driver acceptance of a semi-autonomous forward obstacle collision avoidance system.
    Itoh M; Horikome T; Inagaki T
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Sep; 44(5):756-63. PubMed ID: 23453775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method for evaluating collision avoidance systems using naturalistic driving data.
    McLaughlin SB; Hankey JM; Dingus TA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 18215527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modelling driver behaviour towards innovative warning devices at railway level crossings.
    Tey LS; Wallis G; Cloete S; Ferreira L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Mar; 51():104-11. PubMed ID: 23207839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lateral control assistance for car drivers: a comparison of motor priming and warning systems.
    Navarro J; Mars F; Hoc JM
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):950-60. PubMed ID: 17915609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
    Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toyota drivers' experiences with Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Pre-Collision System, and Lane-Keeping Assist.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    J Safety Res; 2016 Feb; 56():67-73. PubMed ID: 26875167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring relationships between observed activation rates and functional attributes of lane departure prevention.
    Reagan IJ; Cicchino JB; Montalbano CJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(4):424-430. PubMed ID: 31074631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying Vision Zero: Crash avoidance in rural and motorway accident scenarios by combination of ACC, AEB, and LKS projected to German accident occurrence.
    Stark L; Düring M; Schoenawa S; Maschke JE; Do CM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S126-S132. PubMed ID: 31381430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A mathematical model for predicting lane changes using the steering wheel angle.
    Schmidt K; Beggiato M; Hoffmann KH; Krems JF
    J Safety Res; 2014 Jun; 49():85-90. PubMed ID: 24913491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Driver trust in five driver assistance technologies following real-world use in four production vehicles.
    Kidd DG; Cicchino JB; Reagan IJ; Kerfoot LB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S44-S50. PubMed ID: 28339302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How does a collision warning system shape driver's brake response time? The influence of expectancy and automation complacency on real-life emergency braking.
    Ruscio D; Ciceri MR; Biassoni F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Apr; 77():72-81. PubMed ID: 25700125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of blind spot monitoring systems on police-reported lane-change crashes.
    Cicchino JB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(6):615-622. PubMed ID: 29927678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intuitive steering assistance in critical understeer situations.
    Hildebrandt C; Schmidt M; Sedlmayr M; Pion O; Büyükyildiz G; Küçükay F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(5):484-90. PubMed ID: 25287808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An adaptive driver support system: user experiences and driving performance in a simulator.
    Dijksterhuis C; Stuiver A; Mulder B; Brookhuis KA; de Waard D
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):772-85. PubMed ID: 23156622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Volvo and Infiniti drivers' experiences with select crash avoidance technologies.
    Braitman KA; McCartt AT; Zuby DS; Singer J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2010 Jun; 11(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 20544571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lane change behavior with a side blind zone alert system.
    Kiefer RJ; Hankey JM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):683-90. PubMed ID: 18329421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of age and proximity warning devices on collision avoidance in simulated driving.
    Kramer AF; Cassavaugh N; Horrey WJ; Becic E; Mayhugh JL
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):935-49. PubMed ID: 17915608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.