These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24206832)

  • 1. Identification of chemical hazards for terrestrial plants in the regulatory context: comparison of OECD and ISO guidelines.
    Tarazona JV; Cesnaitis R; Herranz-Montes FJ; Versonnen B
    Chemosphere; 2013 Nov; 93(10):2578-84. PubMed ID: 24206832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of the ecotoxicity data submitted within the framework of the REACH Regulation: part 4. Experimental terrestrial toxicity assays.
    Versonnen B; Tarazona JV; Cesnaitis R; Sobanska MA; Sobanski T; Bonnomet V; De Coen W
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Mar; 475():123-31. PubMed ID: 24238811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of the ecotoxicity data submitted within the framework of the REACH Regulation. Part 1. General overview and data availability for the first registration deadline.
    Sobanska MA; Cesnaitis R; Sobanski T; Versonnen B; Bonnomet V; Tarazona JV; De Coen W
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():1225-32. PubMed ID: 24246945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phytotoxicity tests of solid wastes and contaminated soils in the Czech Republic.
    Kocí V; Mocová K; Kulovaná M; Vosáhlová S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2010 Mar; 17(3):611-23. PubMed ID: 19557447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. European experience in chemicals management: integrating science into policy.
    Christensen FM; Eisenreich SJ; Rasmussen K; Sintes JR; Sokull-Kluettgen B; Van de Plassche EJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 20958022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of phytotoxicity data to a new Australian soil quality guideline framework for biosolids.
    Heemsbergen DA; Warne MS; Broos K; Bell M; Nash D; McLaughlin M; Whatmuff M; Barry G; Pritchard D; Penney N
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Apr; 407(8):2546-56. PubMed ID: 19215964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PBT assessment using the revised annex XIII of REACH: a comparison with other regulatory frameworks.
    Moermond CT; Janssen MP; de Knecht JA; Montforts MH; Peijnenburg WJ; Zweers PG; Sijm DT
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Apr; 8(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 22006646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk-based ecological soil quality criteria for the characterization of contaminated soils. Combination of chemical and biological tools.
    Fernández MD; Vega MM; Tarazona JV
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Aug; 366(2-3):466-84. PubMed ID: 16574196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Safe usage of chemicals in European Union countries].
    Graczyk A; Czerczak S; Barański B
    Med Pr; 2010; 61(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 20677433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Labor and pollution prevention in Canada.
    Bennett D
    New Solut; 2012; 22(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 22436206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Control of chemicals in Sweden: an example of misuse of the "precautionary principle".
    Nilsson R
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2004 Feb; 57(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 14759655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time matters: A stock-pollution approach to authorisation decision-making for PBT/vPvB chemicals under REACH.
    Gabbert S; Hilber I
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183():236-244. PubMed ID: 27594688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using the EPC approach to develop health-based soil and water screening concentrations for environmental chemicals.
    Williams CA; James RC; Freeman RW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Aug; 22(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 7494905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The European Union's REACH regulation: a review of its history and requirements.
    Williams ES; Panko J; Paustenbach DJ
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2009; 39(7):553-75. PubMed ID: 19650717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The application of bioassays as indicators of petroleum-contaminated soil remediation.
    Płaza G; Nałecz-Jawecki G; Ulfig K; Brigmon RL
    Chemosphere; 2005 Apr; 59(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 15722101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why the toxic substances control act needs an overhaul, and how to strengthen oversight of chemicals in the interim.
    Vogel SA; Roberts JA
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 May; 30(5):898-905. PubMed ID: 21555473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of reproductive toxicity under REACH.
    Aulmann W
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Jul; 63(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 22475931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the potential hazard of chemical substances for the terrestrial environment. Development of hazard classification criteria and quantitative environmental indicators.
    Tarazona JV; Fresno A; Aycard S; Ramos C; Vega MM; Carbonell G
    Sci Total Environ; 2000 Mar; 247(2-3):151-64. PubMed ID: 10803544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of bioassays for the ecotoxicity assessment of contaminated soils.
    Fernández MD; Babín M; Tarazona JV
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 599():235-62. PubMed ID: 19882290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of approaches for terrestrial hazard classification.
    Renaud FG; Boxall AB; Toy R; Robertson S
    Chemosphere; 2004 Dec; 57(11):1697-706. PubMed ID: 15519416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.