These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24206832)

  • 41. Use of new scientific developments in regulatory risk assessments: challenges and opportunities.
    Tarazona JV
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e85-91. PubMed ID: 23625625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Trade Union Priority List for REACH authorisation.
    Romano D; Santos T; Gadea R
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2011 Jan; 65(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 20508006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. State of the art of contaminated site management in The Netherlands: policy framework and risk assessment tools.
    Swartjes FA; Rutgers M; Lijzen JP; Janssen PJ; Otte PF; Wintersen A; Brand E; Posthuma L
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jun; 427-428():1-10. PubMed ID: 22578694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Partitioning species variability from soil property effects on phytotoxicity: ECx normalization using a plant contaminant sensitivity index.
    Anderson RH; Basta NT; Lanno RP
    J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(5):1701-9. PubMed ID: 18689731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Lessons learned from flame retardant use and regulation could enhance future control of potentially hazardous chemicals.
    Brown P; Cordner A
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 May; 30(5):906-14. PubMed ID: 21555474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Integrating process safety with molecular modeling-based risk assessment of chemicals within the REACH regulatory framework: benefits and future challenges.
    Lewis A; Kazantzis N; Fishtik I; Wilcox J
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Apr; 142(3):592-602. PubMed ID: 16930827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Cross-border impacts of the restriction of hazardous substances: a perspective based on Japanese solders.
    Fuse M; Tsunemi K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Aug; 47(16):9028-34. PubMed ID: 23875815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. How developing nations can protect children from hazardous chemical exposures while sustaining economic growth.
    Trasande L; Massey RI; DiGangi J; Geiser K; Olanipekun AI; Gallagher L
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 Dec; 30(12):2400-9. PubMed ID: 22147869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Soil quality assessment under emerging regulatory requirements.
    Bone J; Head M; Barraclough D; Archer M; Scheib C; Flight D; Voulvoulis N
    Environ Int; 2010 Aug; 36(6):609-22. PubMed ID: 20483160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effect of tributyltin-oxide on earthworms, springtails, and plants in artificial and natural soils.
    Römbke J; Jänsch S; Junker T; Pohl B; Scheffczyk A; Schallnass HJ
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2007 May; 52(4):525-34. PubMed ID: 17380235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Estimation of terrestrial chemical spill risk factors using a modified Delphi approach.
    Bryant DL; Abkowitz MD
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Oct; 85(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 17030401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Managing hazardous pollutants in Chile: arsenic.
    Sancha AM; O'Ryan R
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2008; 196():123-46. PubMed ID: 19025095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The enhancement of the subacute repeat dose toxicity test OECD TG 407 for the detection of endocrine active chemicals: comparison with toxicity tests of longer duration.
    Gelbke HP; Hofmann A; Owens JW; Freyberger A
    Arch Toxicol; 2007 Apr; 81(4):227-50. PubMed ID: 17047927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. What can be learnt from an ecotoxicity database in the framework of the REACh regulation?
    Henegar A; Mombelli E; Pandard P; Péry AR
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jan; 409(3):489-94. PubMed ID: 21093016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Harmonization with international approaches to guidance documents on methods of assessment of the mutagenic properties of chemical environmental factors].
    Zhurkov VS; Sycheva LP; Ingel' FI; Akhal'tseva LV; Iurchenko VV
    Gig Sanit; 2013; (6):49-52. PubMed ID: 24624821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A review of regulatory decisions for environmental protection: part II - the case-study of contaminated land management in Portugal.
    Rodrigues SM; Pereira ME; da Silva EF; Hursthouse AS; Duarte AC
    Environ Int; 2009 Jan; 35(1):214-25. PubMed ID: 18835040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Responsibilities of the European Chemical Agency under REACH].
    Foth H
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2008 Dec; 51(12):1398-407. PubMed ID: 19137215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Soil plant microbe interactions in phytoremediation.
    Karthikeyan R; Kulakow PA
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2003; 78():51-74. PubMed ID: 12674398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of the extraction efficiency for the Hypoaspis aculeifer reproduction test in the context of soil quality assessment.
    Pierre H; Nicolas M; Pascal P
    Ecotoxicology; 2016 Dec; 25(10):1867-1872. PubMed ID: 27681111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The implementation of RAAF in the OECD QSAR Toolbox.
    Kuseva C; Schultz TW; Yordanova D; Tankova K; Kutsarova S; Pavlov T; Chapkanov A; Georgiev M; Gissi A; Sobanski T; Mekenyan OG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Jul; 105():51-61. PubMed ID: 30970268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.