These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24209499)
1. Reader variability in QT measurement due to measurement error and variability in leads selection: a simulation study comparing 2-way vs. 3-way interaction ANOVA model. Natekar M; Karnad DR; Salvi V; Ramasamy A; Kerkar V; Panicker GK; Kothari S J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 24209499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two methods of estimating reader variability in QT interval measurements in thorough QT/QTc studies. Salvi V; Karnad DR; Kerkar V; Panicker GK; Natekar M; Kothari S Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2014 Mar; 19(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 24521536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra- and interreader variability in QT interval measurement by tangent and threshold methods in a central electrocardiogram laboratory. Panicker GK; Karnad DR; Natekar M; Kothari S; Narula D; Lokhandwala Y J Electrocardiol; 2009; 42(4):348-52. PubMed ID: 19261293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of ANOVA to estimate inter- and intra-reader variability for a group of readers in thorough QT/QTc studies. Natekar M; Mahajan V; Satra A; O'Kelly M; Karnad DR Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Mar; 83(3):489-91. PubMed ID: 18183035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The automatic, beat-to-beat determination of the QT interval and analysis of its spontaneous variability under basal conditions]. Chorro Gascó FJ; Guerrero Martínez J; Martínez Sober M; Soria Olivas E; Sanchís Forés J; Ibáñez Candela M; Espí López J; López Merino V Rev Esp Cardiol; 1995 Nov; 48(11):722-31. PubMed ID: 8532941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Bayesian measurement error approach to QT interval correction and prolongation. Chen J; Zhao X J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):523-42. PubMed ID: 20358434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reader- and instrument-dependent variability in the electrocardiographic assessment of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Jain R; Tandri H; Daly A; Tichnell C; James C; Abraham T; Judge DP; Calkins H; Dalal D J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2011 May; 22(5):561-8. PubMed ID: 21114702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of QT-measurement accuracy using the 12-lead electrocardiogram derived from EASI leads. Martínez JP; Laguna P; Olmos S; Pahlm O; Pettersson J; Sörnmo L J Electrocardiol; 2007 Apr; 40(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 17027840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of popular automatic QT interval algorithms assessed by a 'gold standard' and comparison with a Novel method: computer simulation study. Hunt AC BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2005 Sep; 5():29. PubMed ID: 16185361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving the precision of QT measurements. Darpo B; Fossa AA; Couderc JP; Zhou M; Schreyer A; Ticktin M; Zapesochny A Cardiol J; 2011; 18(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 21769821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Study of repolarization heterogeneity and electrocardiographic morphology with a modeling approach. Xue J; Gao W; Chen Y; Han X J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):581-7. PubMed ID: 18804785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Z-score for benchmarking reader competence in a central ECG laboratory. Panicker GK; Karnad DR; Joshi R; Shetty S; Vyas N; Kothari S; Narula D Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2009 Jan; 14(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 19149789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A nonparametric approach to QT interval correction for heart rate. Wang D; Cheung YB; Arezina R; Taubel J; Camm AJ J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):508-22. PubMed ID: 20358433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Precision of QT interval measurement by advanced electrocardiographic equipment. Hnatkova K; Gang Y; Batchvarov VN; Malik M Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Nov; 29(11):1277-84. PubMed ID: 17100684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sample size, power calculations, and their implications for the cost of thorough studies of drug induced QT interval prolongation. Malik M; Hnatkova K; Batchvarov V; Gang Y; Smetana P; Camm AJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Dec; 27(12):1659-69. PubMed ID: 15613131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. QT variability and HRV interactions in ECG: quantification and reliability. Almeida R; Gouveia S; Rocha AP; Pueyo E; Martínez JP; Laguna P IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 53(7):1317-29. PubMed ID: 16830936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences between QT and RR intervals in digital and digitized paper electrocardiograms: contribution of the printer, scanner, and digitization process. Hingorani P; Karnad DR; Panicker GK; Deshmukh S; Kothari S; Narula D J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):370-5. PubMed ID: 18482732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inter- and intraday variability in major electrocardiogram intervals and amplitudes in healthy men and women. Dota CD; Edvardsson N; Schützer KM; Olofsson EL; Malm A; Morsing T; Fager G Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 26(1P2):361-6. PubMed ID: 12687846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diurnal pattern of QTc interval: how long is prolonged? Possible relation to circadian triggers of cardiovascular events. Molnar J; Zhang F; Weiss J; Ehlert FA; Rosenthal JE J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 27(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 8522713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]