These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24209651)

  • 41. Residency selection: do the perceptions of US programme directors and applicants match?
    Go PH; Klaassen Z; Chamberlain RS
    Med Educ; 2012 May; 46(5):491-500. PubMed ID: 22515757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Outcome analysis of factors impacting the plastic surgery match.
    Wood JS; David LR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Jun; 64(6):770-4. PubMed ID: 20489406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Selecting Residents for Predetermined Factors Identified and Thought to be Important for Work Performance and Satisfaction: A Methodology.
    McGuire KJ; Sparks MB; Gitajn IL; Henderson ER; Jevsevar DS; Paddock NG; Coe MP
    J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(4):949-961. PubMed ID: 30846348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. What do surgical nurses know about surgical residents?
    Schlitzkus LL; Agle SC; McNally MM; Schenarts KD; Schenarts PJ
    J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(6):383-91. PubMed ID: 20142140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Selection, mentorship, and subsequent placement of preliminary residents without a designated categorical position in an academic general surgery residency program.
    Montero P; Powell R; Travis CM; Nehler MR
    J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 23111047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Use and utility of Web-based residency program information: a survey of residency applicants.
    Embi PJ; Desai S; Cooney TG
    J Med Internet Res; 2003; 5(3):e22. PubMed ID: 14517113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Resident selection criteria for advanced education in prosthodontic programs: program directors' perspective.
    Yuan JC; Lee DJ; Knoernschild KL; Campbell SD; Sukotjo C
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Jun; 19(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 20210858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Impact of a Preinterview Dinner on Candidate Perception of a Fellowship Training Program.
    Skalski JH; Dulohery MM; Kelm DJ; Ramar K
    J Grad Med Educ; 2016 Dec; 8(5):763-766. PubMed ID: 28018544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Attitudes and practices of surgery residency program directors toward the use of social networking profiles to select residency candidates: a nationwide survey analysis.
    Go PH; Klaassen Z; Chamberlain RS
    J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(3):292-300. PubMed ID: 22483127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Gender and Letters of Recommendation: A Linguistic Comparison of the Impact of Gender on General Surgery Residency Applicants
    French JC; Zolin SJ; Lampert E; Aiello A; Bencsath KP; Ritter KA; Strong AT; Lipman JM; Valente MA; Prabhu AS
    J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(4):899-905. PubMed ID: 30598383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Applicants' choice of an ophthalmology residency program.
    Yousuf SJ; Kwagyan J; Jones LS
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Feb; 120(2):423-7. PubMed ID: 23084123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Home-field advantage: the role of selection bias in the general surgery national residency matching program.
    Falcone JL
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(4):461-5. PubMed ID: 23725933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Characteristics of the residency interview process preferred by medical student applicants.
    Schneeweiss R; Bergman J; Clayton J
    J Fam Pract; 1982 Oct; 15(4):669-72. PubMed ID: 7119692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Correlation of Behavioral Interviewing Performance With Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applicant Characteristics☆?>.
    Breitkopf DM; Vaughan LE; Hopkins MR
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):954-958. PubMed ID: 27321984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Recruitment behavior and program directors: how ethical are their perspectives about the match process?
    Carek PJ; Anderson KD; Blue AV; Mavis BE
    Fam Med; 2000 Apr; 32(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 10782372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Factors neurosurgery candidates use when choosing a residency program.
    Marasa LH; Pittman TA
    J Neurosurg; 2014 Jan; 120(1):167-72. PubMed ID: 24138205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Residency characteristics that matter most to plastic surgery applicants: a multi-institutional analysis and review of the literature.
    Sinno S; Mehta K; Squitieri L; Ranganathan K; Koeckert MS; Patel A; Saadeh PB; Thanik V
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Jun; 74(6):713-7. PubMed ID: 25969975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. In-group bias in residency selection.
    Bass A; Wu C; Schaefer JP; Wright B; McLaughlin K
    Med Teach; 2013 Sep; 35(9):747-51. PubMed ID: 23805954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Virtual Interviews for the Independent Plastic Surgery Match: A Modern Convenience or a Modern Misrepresentation?
    Bamba R; Bhagat N; Tran PC; Westrick E; Hassanein AH; Wooden WA
    J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(2):612-621. PubMed ID: 32958417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. General surgery residency program websites: usefulness and usability for resident applicants.
    Reilly EF; Leibrandt TJ; Zonno AJ; Simpson MC; Morris JB
    Curr Surg; 2004; 61(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 15051272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.