These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2420984)

  • 1. Speech communication for the deaf: visual, tactile, and cochlear-implant.
    Pickett JM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 2420984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audiological rehabilitation with cochlear implants and tactile aids.
    Osberger MJ
    ASHA; 1990 Apr; 32(4):38-43. PubMed ID: 2139781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Longitudinal improvements in communication and socialization of deaf children with cochlear implants and hearing aids: evidence from parental reports.
    Bat-Chava Y; Martin D; Kosciw JG
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2005 Dec; 46(12):1287-96. PubMed ID: 16313429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic characteristics of the speech of young cochlear implant users: a comparison with normal-hearing age-mates.
    Uchanski RM; Geers AE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):90S-105S. PubMed ID: 12612484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Within-subject comparison of speech perception benefits with a multiple-channel cochlear implant and a tactile device.
    Sarant JZ; Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():339-41. PubMed ID: 7668697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of visual and tactile sensory aids in speech production training: a preliminary report.
    McGarr NS; Head J; Friedman M; Behrman AM; Youdelman K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 2420983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Receptive vocabulary development in deaf children with cochlear implants: achievement in an intensive auditory-oral educational setting.
    Hayes H; Geers AE; Treiman R; Moog JS
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):128-35. PubMed ID: 19125035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of multichannel tactile aids and multichannel cochlear implants in children with profound hearing impairments.
    Miyamoto RT; Robbins AM; Osberger MJ; Todd SL; Riley AI; Kirk KI
    Am J Otol; 1995 Jan; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 8579182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory implants and tactile aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Pickett JM; McFarland W
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Mar; 28(1):134-50. PubMed ID: 3884896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of benefit from vibrotactile aid and cochlear implant for postlinguistically deaf adults.
    Skinner MW; Binzer SM; Fredrickson JM; Smith PG; Holden TA; Holden LK; Juelich MF; Turner BA
    Laryngoscope; 1988 Oct; 98(10):1092-9. PubMed ID: 3172956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Auditory and communication learning in patients with cochlear implants].
    Bucher PO; Mathis A; Arnold W
    HNO; 1989 Jun; 37(6):250-4. PubMed ID: 2745170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A hand held two-channel vibro-tactile speech communication aid for the deaf: characteristics and results.
    Spens KE; Huss C; Dahlqvist M; Agelfors E
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():7-13. PubMed ID: 9428037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longitudinal speech perception performance of young children with cochlear implants and tactile aids plus hearing aids.
    Eilers RE; Cobo-Lewis AB; Vergara KC; Oller DK
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():50-4. PubMed ID: 9428045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech perception in congenitally, pre-lingually and post-lingually deaf children expressed in an equivalent hearing loss value.
    Rotteveel LJ; Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 33(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 19126130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants].
    Hamzavi J; Adunka O; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Longitudinal comparison of the benefits of cochlear implants and tactile aids in a controlled educational setting.
    Geers AE; Tobey EA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():328-9. PubMed ID: 7668691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longitudinal changes in children's speech and voice physiology after cochlear implantation.
    Higgins MB; McCleary EA; Carney AE; Schulte L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):48-70. PubMed ID: 12598813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A; Brenner C; Davidson L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Background and educational characteristics of prelingually deaf children implanted by five years of age.
    Geers A; Brenner C
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):2S-14S. PubMed ID: 12612476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Perception of acoustic speech features with single channel cochlear implants and hearing aids. A comparative analysis].
    Dillier N; Spillmann T
    HNO; 1988 Aug; 36(8):335-41. PubMed ID: 3170279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.