271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24209910)
1. Factors affecting accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guides in edentulous mandibles.
Ochi M; Kanazawa M; Sato D; Kasugai S; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Comput Biol Med; 2013 Nov; 43(11):1653-60. PubMed ID: 24209910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide.
Sarment DP; Sukovic P; Clinthorne N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 12939011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae.
D'haese J; Van De Velde T; Elaut L; De Bruyn H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 19906267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results.
Di Giacomo GA; Cury PR; de Araujo NS; Sendyk WR; Sendyk CL
J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.
Ozan O; Turkyilmaz I; Ersoy AE; McGlumphy EA; Rosenstiel SF
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 19138616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides.
Ozan O; Orhan K; Turkyilmaz I
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1755-61. PubMed ID: 21959426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I.
Pettersson A; Kero T; Gillot L; Cannas B; Fäldt J; Söderberg R; Näsström K
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):334-42. PubMed ID: 20493322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of a Dedicated Bone-Supported Surgical Template for Dental Implant Placement with Direct Visual Control.
Sun Y; Luebbers HT; Agbaje JO; Kong L; Schepers S; Daems L; Legrand P; Jacobs R; Politis C; Vrielinck L
J Healthc Eng; 2015; 6(4):779-89. PubMed ID: 27010564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vitro model to evaluate the accuracy of guided surgery systems.
Soares MM; Harari ND; Cardoso ES; Manso MC; Conz MB; Vidigal GM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):824-31. PubMed ID: 22848884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guide with a handpiece guidance apparatus: a case report.
Ozan O; Seker E; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S; Ersoy AE
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):603-9. PubMed ID: 21767212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using CBCT-Derived Mucosa-Supported Stereolithographic Template.
Sun Y; Luebbers HT; Agbaje JO; Schepers S; Politis C; Van Slycke S; Vrielinck L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17(5):862-70. PubMed ID: 24341829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible.
Cassetta M; Giansanti M; Di Mambro A; Stefanelli LV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1071-8. PubMed ID: 25216132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques.
Arisan V; Karabuda CZ; Ozdemir T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):980-8. PubMed ID: 20497439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template.
Vercruyssen M; Cox C; Coucke W; Naert I; Jacobs R; Quirynen M
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):717-23. PubMed ID: 24460748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical template.
Cassetta M; Stefanelli LV; Giansanti M; Calasso S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 22616060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
