These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24209910)
1. Factors affecting accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guides in edentulous mandibles. Ochi M; Kanazawa M; Sato D; Kasugai S; Hirano S; Minakuchi S Comput Biol Med; 2013 Nov; 43(11):1653-60. PubMed ID: 24209910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Sarment DP; Sukovic P; Clinthorne N Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 12939011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae. D'haese J; Van De Velde T; Elaut L; De Bruyn H Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 19906267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study. Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. Di Giacomo GA; Cury PR; de Araujo NS; Sendyk WR; Sendyk CL J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. Ozan O; Turkyilmaz I; Ersoy AE; McGlumphy EA; Rosenstiel SF J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 19138616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides. Ozan O; Orhan K; Turkyilmaz I J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1755-61. PubMed ID: 21959426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I. Pettersson A; Kero T; Gillot L; Cannas B; Fäldt J; Söderberg R; Näsström K J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):334-42. PubMed ID: 20493322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of a Dedicated Bone-Supported Surgical Template for Dental Implant Placement with Direct Visual Control. Sun Y; Luebbers HT; Agbaje JO; Kong L; Schepers S; Daems L; Legrand P; Jacobs R; Politis C; Vrielinck L J Healthc Eng; 2015; 6(4):779-89. PubMed ID: 27010564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vitro model to evaluate the accuracy of guided surgery systems. Soares MM; Harari ND; Cardoso ES; Manso MC; Conz MB; Vidigal GM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):824-31. PubMed ID: 22848884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guide with a handpiece guidance apparatus: a case report. Ozan O; Seker E; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S; Ersoy AE J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):603-9. PubMed ID: 21767212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using CBCT-Derived Mucosa-Supported Stereolithographic Template. Sun Y; Luebbers HT; Agbaje JO; Schepers S; Politis C; Van Slycke S; Vrielinck L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17(5):862-70. PubMed ID: 24341829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible. Cassetta M; Giansanti M; Di Mambro A; Stefanelli LV Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1071-8. PubMed ID: 25216132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques. Arisan V; Karabuda CZ; Ozdemir T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):980-8. PubMed ID: 20497439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. Vercruyssen M; Cox C; Coucke W; Naert I; Jacobs R; Quirynen M J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):717-23. PubMed ID: 24460748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical template. Cassetta M; Stefanelli LV; Giansanti M; Calasso S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 22616060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]