BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24209932)

  • 1. Estimation of the breast skin-line in mammograms using multidirectional Gabor filters.
    Casti P; Mencattini A; Salmeri M; Ancona A; Mangeri F; Pepe ML; Rangayyan RM
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 Nov; 43(11):1870-81. PubMed ID: 24209932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic multiple thresholding breast boundary detection algorithm for mammograms.
    Wu YT; Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Hadjiiski LM; Daly CP; Douglas JA; Zhang Y; Sahiner B; Shi J; Wei J
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):391-401. PubMed ID: 20175501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation.
    Keller BM; Nathan DL; Wang Y; Zheng Y; Gee JC; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4903-17. PubMed ID: 22894417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
    Kus P; Karagoz I
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming.
    Song E; Xu S; Xu X; Zeng J; Lan Y; Zhang S; Hung CC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20817575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms.
    Ferrari RJ; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE; Borges RA; Frère AF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Feb; 23(2):232-45. PubMed ID: 14964567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A dual-stage method for lesion segmentation on digital mammograms.
    Yuan Y; Giger ML; Li H; Suzuki K; Sennett C
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4180-93. PubMed ID: 18072482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incomplete skin representation in digital mammograms.
    Burgess AE; Kang H
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2834-8. PubMed ID: 15543791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel automatic suspicious mass regions identification using Havrda & Charvat entropy and Otsu's N thresholding.
    Kurt B; Nabiyev VV; Turhan K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 May; 114(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 24681199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gray-scale and geometric registration of full-field digital and film-screen mammograms.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    Med Image Anal; 2007 Apr; 11(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 17208511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer aided system for segmentation and visualization of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Reljin B; Milosević Z; Stojić T; Reljin I
    Folia Histochem Cytobiol; 2009 Jan; 47(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 20164042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of asymmetry in mammograms via directional filtering with Gabor wavelets.
    Ferrari RJ; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE; Frère AF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Sep; 20(9):953-64. PubMed ID: 11585211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography.
    Penedo M; Pearlman WA; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Oct; 22(10):1288-96. PubMed ID: 14552582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer aided detection system for micro calcifications in digital mammograms.
    Mohamed H; Mabrouk MS; Sharawy A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Oct; 116(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 24909786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computerized image analysis: texture-field orientation method for pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms.
    Zhou C; Wei J; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Douglas JA
    Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2289-99. PubMed ID: 20527563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiscale curvelet transform.
    Eltoukhy MM; Faye I; Samir BB
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Jun; 34(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 20004076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Segmentation of mammography by applying GrowCut for mass detection.
    Cordeiro FR; Santos WP; Silva-Filhoa AG
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():87-91. PubMed ID: 23920521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.