These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24210767)

  • 1. Ophthalmic randomized controlled trials reports: the statement of the hypothesis.
    Lee CF; Cheng AC; Fong DY
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 157(1):254-259.e1. PubMed ID: 24210767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eyes or subjects: are ophthalmic randomized controlled trials properly designed and analyzed?
    Lee CF; Cheng AC; Fong DY
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Apr; 119(4):869-72. PubMed ID: 22226885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials.
    Le Henanff A; Giraudeau B; Baron G; Ravaud P
    JAMA; 2006 Mar; 295(10):1147-51. PubMed ID: 16522835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative effectiveness clinical trials in psychiatry: superiority, noninferiority, and the role of active comparators.
    Leon AC
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2011 Oct; 72(10):1344-9. PubMed ID: 21367350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protocol adherence rates in superiority and noninferiority randomized clinical trials published in high impact medical journals.
    Bamat NA; Ekhaguere OA; Zhang L; Flannery DD; Handley SC; Herrick HM; Ellenberg SS
    Clin Trials; 2020 Oct; 17(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 32666826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating equivalence and noninferiority trials.
    Dasgupta A; Lawson KA; Wilson JP
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2010 Aug; 67(16):1337-43. PubMed ID: 20689122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the quality of active-control trials in periodontal research.
    Tu YK; Maddick I; Kellett M; Clerehugh V; Gilthorpe MS
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 33(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 16441741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical issues and recommendations for noninferiority trials in oncology: a systematic review.
    Tanaka S; Kinjo Y; Kataoka Y; Yoshimura K; Teramukai S
    Clin Cancer Res; 2012 Apr; 18(7):1837-47. PubMed ID: 22317762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reporting the results of randomized clinical trials: a priority of Archives of Ophthalmology.
    Beck RW
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 122(7):1038-9. PubMed ID: 15249369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How evidence-based are publications in clinical ophthalmic journals?
    Lai TY; Leung GM; Wong VW; Lam RF; Cheng AC; Lam DS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 May; 47(5):1831-8. PubMed ID: 16638988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rationale for and methods of superiority, noninferiority, or equivalence designs in orthopaedic, controlled trials.
    Vavken P
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Sep; 469(9):2645-53. PubMed ID: 21246313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality of reporting of key methodological items of randomized controlled trials in clinical ophthalmic journals.
    Lai TY; Wong VW; Lam RF; Cheng AC; Lam DS; Leung GM
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2007; 14(6):390-8. PubMed ID: 18161613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The importance of equivalence trials in showing the usefulness of treatments].
    Hermens ML; van Hout HP; Terluin B; Adèr HJ; de Haan M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Nov; 147(44):2162-6. PubMed ID: 14626832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low power and type II errors in recent ophthalmology research.
    Khan Z; Milko J; Iqbal M; Masri M; Almeida DRP
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 51(5):368-372. PubMed ID: 27769328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Empirical Consequences of Current Recommendations for the Design and Interpretation of Noninferiority Trials.
    Aberegg SK; Hersh AM; Samore MH
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Jan; 33(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 28875400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The value of randomized clinical trials in ophthalmology.
    Chew EY
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Apr; 151(4):575-8. PubMed ID: 21420522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery: a systematic review.
    Agha R; Cooper D; Muir G
    Int J Surg; 2007 Dec; 5(6):413-22. PubMed ID: 18029237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals.
    Parent N; Hanley JA
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 19(2):25-39. PubMed ID: 19517902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of noninferiority margins reported in protocols and publications showed incomplete and inconsistent reporting.
    Dekkers OM; Cevallos M; Bührer J; Poncet A; Ackermann Rau S; Perneger TV; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 25450451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Specific statistical considerations relevant to the design and analysis of gingivitis trials demonstrating product superiority or equivalence.
    Kingman A
    J Periodontal Res; 1992 Jul; 27(4 Pt 2):378-89; discussion 390-4. PubMed ID: 1507027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.