These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24211758)

  • 21. Decision-making around moving on from full-time education: the roles and experiences of parents of disabled young people with degenerative conditions.
    Maddison J; Beresford B
    Health Soc Care Community; 2012 Sep; 20(5):477-87. PubMed ID: 22360589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How well are we meeting haematological cancer survivors' preferences for involvement in treatment decision making?
    Carey M; Anderson A; Sanson-Fisher R; Lynagh M; Paul C; Tzelepis F
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jul; 88(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 22296772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Efficiency and equity: a stated preference approach.
    Norman R; Hall J; Street D; Viney R
    Health Econ; 2013 May; 22(5):568-81. PubMed ID: 22529053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Being responsible versus acting responsibly: effects of agency and risk taking on responsibility judgments.
    Nordbye GH; Teigen KH
    Scand J Psychol; 2014 Apr; 55(2):102-14. PubMed ID: 24601909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enhanced support for shared decision making reduced costs of care for patients with preference-sensitive conditions.
    Veroff D; Marr A; Wennberg DE
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Feb; 32(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 23381521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Agency and the construction of social preference: between inequality aversion and prosocial behavior.
    Choshen-Hillel S; Yaniv I
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Dec; 101(6):1253-61. PubMed ID: 21767033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Selective exposure and information quantity: how different information quantities moderate decision makers' preference for consistent and inconsistent information.
    Fischer P; Schulz-Hardt S; Frey D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Feb; 94(2):231-44. PubMed ID: 18211174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Preference for negative emotions.
    Västfjäll D; Gärling T
    Emotion; 2006 May; 6(2):326-9. PubMed ID: 16768564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Individual differences in decision making by foraging hummingbirds.
    Morgan KV; Hurly TA; Healy SD
    Behav Processes; 2014 Nov; 109 Pt B():195-200. PubMed ID: 25181327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Discounting the freedom to choose: implications for the paradox of choice.
    Reed DD; Kaplan BA; Brewer AT
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):424-7. PubMed ID: 22503945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Instrumental relating and treatment decision making among older women with early-stage breast cancer.
    Pieters HC; Heilemann MV; Maliski S; Dornig K; Mentes J
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2012 Jan; 39(1):E10-9. PubMed ID: 22201664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing the influence of gestalt-type characteristics on preferences over lifetime health profiles.
    Oliver A
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):723-31. PubMed ID: 18378938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Randomised preference trial of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy less than 14 weeks' gestation (TOPS).
    Robson SC; Kelly T; Howel D; Deverill M; Hewison J; Lie ML; Stamp E; Armstrong N; May CR
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Nov; 13(53):1-124, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 19906334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Choosing the greater of two goods: neural currencies for valuation and decision making.
    Sugrue LP; Corrado GS; Newsome WT
    Nat Rev Neurosci; 2005 May; 6(5):363-75. PubMed ID: 15832198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Further evidence of preference reversals: choice, valuation and ranking over distributions of life expectancy.
    Oliver A
    J Health Econ; 2006 Sep; 25(5):803-20. PubMed ID: 16183157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Doc, what would you do if you were me? On self-other discrepancies in medical decision making.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Galesic M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Mar; 18(1):38-51. PubMed ID: 22039766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patients' perspectives of the substitute decision maker: who makes better decisions?
    Mirzaei K; Milanifar A; Asghari F
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Sep; 37(9):523-5. PubMed ID: 21478422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. HPV testing versus repeat Pap testing for the management of a minor abnormal Pap smear: evaluation of a decision aid to support informed choice.
    McCaffery KJ; Irwig L; Chan SF; Macaskill P; Barratt A; Lewicka M; Clarke J; Weisberg E
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):473-9, 481. PubMed ID: 18757164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of self-other decision making on regulatory focus and choice overload.
    Polman E
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 May; 102(5):980-93. PubMed ID: 22429272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preference reversal in multiattribute choice.
    Tsetsos K; Usher M; Chater N
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Oct; 117(4):1275-93. PubMed ID: 21038979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.