These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24214149)

  • 41. Redressing the power and effect of significance. A new approach to an old problem: teaching statistics to nursing students.
    Taylor S; Muncer S
    Nurse Educ Today; 2000 Jul; 20(5):358-64. PubMed ID: 10895117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. ESID, dissemination, and community psychology: a case of partial implementation?
    Gray DO; Jakes SS; Emshoff J; Blakely C
    Am J Community Psychol; 2003 Dec; 32(3-4):359-70. PubMed ID: 14703270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Disengagement with cognitive tasks decreases effect sizes.
    Duncan K; Davachi L
    Nat Hum Behav; 2018 Sep; 2(9):606. PubMed ID: 31346270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Statistical power and parameter stability when subjects are few and tests are many: comment on Peterson, Smith, Martorana, and Owens (2003).
    Hollenbeck JR; DeRue DS; Mannor M
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jan; 91(1):1-5; discussion 6-8. PubMed ID: 16435933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Clearinghouse Standards of Evidence on the Transparency, Openness, and Reproducibility of Intervention Evaluations.
    Mayo-Wilson E; Grant S; Supplee LH
    Prev Sci; 2022 Jul; 23(5):774-786. PubMed ID: 34357509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. "Replicability and other features of a high-quality science: Toward a balanced and empirical approach": Correction to Finkel et al. (2017).
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Nov; 113(5):768. PubMed ID: 29016166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The pitfall of experimenting on the web: How unattended selective attrition leads to surprising (yet false) research conclusions.
    Zhou H; Fishbach A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Oct; 111(4):493-504. PubMed ID: 27295328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Research practices and statistical reporting quality in 250 economic psychology master's theses: a meta-research investigation.
    Olsen J; Mosen J; Voracek M; Kirchler E
    R Soc Open Sci; 2019 Dec; 6(12):190738. PubMed ID: 31903199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Ostracism Online: A social media ostracism paradigm.
    Wolf W; Levordashka A; Ruff JR; Kraaijeveld S; Lueckmann JM; Williams KD
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Jun; 47(2):361-73. PubMed ID: 24878596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.
    Verbitskaya EV
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S89-90. PubMed ID: 26639728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects.
    Kvarven A; Strømland E; Johannesson M
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 4(4):423-434. PubMed ID: 31873200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. It's Time to Broaden the Replicability Conversation: Thoughts for and From Clinical Psychological Science.
    Tackett JL; Lilienfeld SO; Patrick CJ; Johnson SL; Krueger RF; Miller JD; Oltmanns TF; Shrout PE
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2017 Sep; 12(5):742-756. PubMed ID: 28972844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Internet research in psychology.
    Gosling SD; Mason W
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2015 Jan; 66():877-902. PubMed ID: 25251483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Entrepreneurship research and practice: a call to action for psychology.
    Hisrich R; Langan-Fox J; Grant S
    Am Psychol; 2007 Sep; 62(6):575-89. PubMed ID: 17874898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Knowledge level of effect size statistics, confidence intervals and meta-analysis in Spanish academic psychologists.
    Badenes-Ribera L; Frias-Navarro D; Pascual-Soler M; Monterde-I-Bort H
    Psicothema; 2016 Nov; 28(4):448-456. PubMed ID: 27776615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A new tool to assess treatment fidelity and evaluation of treatment fidelity across 10 years of health behavior research.
    Borrelli B; Sepinwall D; Ernst D; Bellg AJ; Czajkowski S; Breger R; DeFrancesco C; Levesque C; Sharp DL; Ogedegbe G; Resnick B; Orwig D
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2005 Oct; 73(5):852-60. PubMed ID: 16287385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Imagine: towards an integrated and applied social psychology.
    Abell J; Walton C
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2010 Dec; 49(Pt 4):685-90; discussion 691-701. PubMed ID: 21260961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Interpretation mistakes in statistical methods: their importance and some recommendations].
    Monterde i Bort H; Pascual Llobel J; Frías Navarro MD
    Psicothema; 2006 Nov; 18(4):848-56. PubMed ID: 17296128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Influence of the way results are presented on research interpretation and medical decision making: the PRIMER collaboration randomized studies.
    Shakespeare TP; Gebski V; Tang J; Lim K; Lu JJ; Zhang X; Jiang G
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(1):127-37. PubMed ID: 18083993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.