These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24214514)

  • 1. The Ranschburg effect: Stimulus variables and scoring criterion*.
    Mewaldt SP; Hinrichs JV
    Mem Cognit; 1973 Jun; 1(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 24214514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feelings of knowing in the Ranschburg effect.
    Florer FL; Allen G
    Am J Psychol; 2000; 113(2):179-98. PubMed ID: 10862341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Ranschburg effect: the role of guessing strategies.
    Greene RL
    Mem Cognit; 1991 May; 19(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1861617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Item repetition in short-term memory: Ranschburg repeated.
    Henson RN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Sep; 24(5):1162-81. PubMed ID: 9747528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tactile Ranschburg effects: facilitation and inhibitory repetition effects analogous to verbal memory.
    Roe D; Miles C; Johnson AJ
    Memory; 2017 Jul; 25(6):793-799. PubMed ID: 27556958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tactile memory Ranschburg effects under conditions of concurrent articulation.
    Johnson AJ; Skinner R; Takwoingi P; Miles C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1855-1862. PubMed ID: 30931821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interresponse times in serial recall: effects of intraserial repetition.
    Kahana MJ; Jacobs J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Sep; 26(5):1188-97. PubMed ID: 11009252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repetition inhibition and facilitation effects for visual-verbal stimuli under conditions of concurrent articulation.
    Johnson AJ; Hawley R; Miles C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Apr; 71(4):817-823. PubMed ID: 28375044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enumeration produces poor primacy for tactile presentation relative to visual and auditory presentation as the only modality effect.
    Gibbons JA; Velkey AJ; Partin KT
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Jun; 106(3):795-810. PubMed ID: 18712201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repetition blindness: perception or memory failure?
    Fagot C; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Apr; 21(2):275-92. PubMed ID: 7714472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The modality effect and echoic persistence.
    Watkins OC; Watkins MJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Sep; 109(3):251-78. PubMed ID: 6447188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aging and the Ranschburg effect: no evidence of reduced response suppression in old age.
    Maylor EA; Henson RN
    Psychol Aging; 2000 Dec; 15(4):657-70. PubMed ID: 11144325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The test developer's dilemma: Evaluating the balance of feasibility and empiric performance of test development techniques for repeated written assessments.
    Shappell E; Wagner MJ; Bailitz J; Mead T; Ahn J; Eyre A; Maldonado N; Wallace B; Park YS
    Med Teach; 2023 Feb; 45(2):187-192. PubMed ID: 36065641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of encoding strategy, presentation modality, and scoring method on STM performance with the Peterson and Peterson technique.
    Johansson BS; Lindberg LG; Svensson ML
    Mem Cognit; 1974 Jul; 2(4):656-62. PubMed ID: 24203734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Segregation accuracy in item-method directed forgetting across multiple tests.
    Goernert PN; Widner RL; Otani H
    Br J Psychol; 2006 May; 97(Pt 2):245-58. PubMed ID: 16613651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metamemory expectancy illusion and schema-consistent guessing in source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):470-496. PubMed ID: 30024249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for auditory temporal distinctiveness: modality effects in order and frequency judgments.
    Glenberg AM; Fernandez A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Oct; 14(4):728-39. PubMed ID: 2972805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relational and item-specific information as determinants of category superiority effects.
    Sharps MJ; Wilson-Leff CA; Price JL
    J Gen Psychol; 1995 Jul; 122(3):271-85. PubMed ID: 7650521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of temporal coding: auditory-visual comparisons.
    Schab FR; Crowder RG
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):384-97. PubMed ID: 2761399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The effect of orthographic familiarity on recall of stimulus items read aloud].
    Yokoyama S
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1991 Aug; 62(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 1749128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.