These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24215715)

  • 21. Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems.
    Kobayashi M; Srinivasan M; Ammann P; Perriard J; Ohkubo C; Müller F; Belser UC; Schimmel M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 23566266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computer-guided flapless placement and immediate loading of four conical screw-type implants in the edentulous mandible.
    Wittwer G; Adeyemo WL; Wagner A; Enislidis G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):534-9. PubMed ID: 17441980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Immediate loading of two unsplinted mandibular implants in edentulous patients with an implant-retained overdenture: an observational study over two years.
    Büttel AE; Gratwohl DA; Sendi P; Marinello CP
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2012; 122(5):392-7. PubMed ID: 22678703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of number and distribution of unsplinted maxillary implants on the load transfer in implant-retained maxillary overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Damghani S; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 22633591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
    De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Immediate loading of mandibular overdentures supported by unsplinted direct laser metal-forming implants: results from a 1-year prospective study.
    Mangano C; Mangano FG; Shibli JA; Ricci M; Perrotti V; d'Avila S; Piattelli A
    J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 21627459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Immediate functional loading of Brånemark system implants in edentulous mandibles: clinical report of the results of developmental and simplified protocols.
    Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ; Rangert B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):250-7. PubMed ID: 12705304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
    MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: a randomized prospective 5-year study.
    Gotfredsen K; Holm B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 11203620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Timing of loading--immediate, early, or delayed--in the outcome of implants in the edentulous mandible: a prospective clinical trial.
    De Smet E; Duyck J; Vander Sloten J; Jacobs R; Naert I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):580-94. PubMed ID: 17929519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of masticatory efficiency and OHRQoL in implant-retained overdenture with different numbers of implant in the edentulous mandible: a one-year follow-up prospective study.
    Sagheb K; Wentaschek S; Bjelopavlovic M; Berres M; Díaz L; Fan S; Schiegnitz E; Al-Nawas B; Sagheb K
    Int J Implant Dent; 2024 Mar; 10(1):12. PubMed ID: 38480586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Marginal bone loss adjacent to conventional and immediate loaded two implants supporting a ball-retained mandibular overdenture: a 3-year randomized clinical trial.
    Elsyad MA; Al-Mahdy YF; Fouad MM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):496-503. PubMed ID: 21504479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading.
    Assad AS; Hassan SA; Shawky YM; Badawy MM
    Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):212-23. PubMed ID: 17563512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with telescopic crowns or milled bars: a 3-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Sütö D; Seemann R; Piehslinger E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 21504478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of resilient liner and clip attachments for bar-implant-retained mandibular overdentures on opposing maxillary ridge. A 5-year randomised clinical trial.
    Elsyad MA; Ashmawy TM; Faramawy AG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 41(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 24354686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Immediate occlusal loading of implants in the partially edentate mandible: a prospective 1-year radiographic and 4-year clinical study.
    Ostman PO; Hellman M; Sennerby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):315-22. PubMed ID: 18548929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Single unit attachments improve peri-implant soft tissue conditions in mandibular overdentures supported by four implants.
    Cordaro L; di Torresanto VM; Petricevic N; Jornet PR; Torsello F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 May; 24(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 22320359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years.
    Kaufmann R; Friedli M; Hug S; Mericske-Stern R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 19548404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Space requirement of a prefabricated bar on two interforaminal implants: a prospective clinical study.
    Albrecht D; Ramierez A; Kremer U; Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R; Enkling N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 25069867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.