542 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24215760)
1. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration needles: which one and in what situation?
Karadsheh Z; Al-Haddad M
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2014 Jan; 24(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 24215760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tips to overcome technical challenges in EUS-guided tissue acquisition.
Vilmann P; Seicean A; Săftoiu A
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2014 Jan; 24(1):109-24. PubMed ID: 24215763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy.
Panic N; Larghi A
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2014 Jan; 24(1):83-107. PubMed ID: 24215762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective evaluation of the optimal number of 25-gauge needle passes for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions in the absence of an onsite cytopathologist.
Suzuki R; Irisawa A; Bhutani MS; Hikichi T; Takagi T; Sato A; Sato M; Ikeda T; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Tasaki K; Obara K; Ohira H
Dig Endosc; 2012 Nov; 24(6):452-6. PubMed ID: 23078439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
Sur YK; Kim YC; Kim JK; Lee JH; Yoo BM; Kim YB
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2163-9. PubMed ID: 26491091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study.
Rodrigues-Pinto E; Jalaj S; Grimm IS; Baron TH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 27345131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative needle study: EUS-FNA procedures using the HD ProCore(™) and EchoTip(®) 22-gauge needle types.
Witt BL; Adler DG; Hilden K; Layfield LJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1069-74. PubMed ID: 23513000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Comparing EUS Sonopsy CY(R) and 22-gauge Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions.
Mizukawa S; Kato H; Muro S; Akimoto Y; Uchida D; Tomoda T; Matsumoto K; Yamamoto N; Horiguchi S; Tsutsumi K; Okada H; Inoue H; Tanaka N
Acta Med Okayama; 2016 Oct; 70(5):417-420. PubMed ID: 27777439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Current status of newer generation endoscopic ultrasound core needles in the diagnostic evaluation of gastrointestinal lesions.
Soltani AK; Krishnan K
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(5):389-395. PubMed ID: 32680792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The cellularity yield of three different 22-gauge endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration needles.
Othman MO; Abdelfatah MM; Padilla O; Hussinat M; Elhanafi S; Eloliby M; Torabi A; Hakim N; Boman DA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2017 May; 45(5):426-432. PubMed ID: 28261978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pitfalls in EUS FNA.
Fujii LL; Levy MJ
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2014 Jan; 24(1):125-42. PubMed ID: 24215764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions.
Iwashita T; Nakai Y; Samarasena JB; Park DH; Zhang Z; Gu M; Lee JG; Chang KJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):909-15. PubMed ID: 23433596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 22-gauge core
Sterlacci W; Sioulas AD; Veits L; Gönüllü P; Schachschal G; Groth S; Anders M; Kontos CK; Topalidis T; Hinsch A; Vieth M; Rösch T; Denzer UW
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8820-8830. PubMed ID: 27818598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) needles. How to handle specimens?
Araujo IK; Solé M; Ginès A
Minerva Med; 2014 Oct; 105(5):323-31. PubMed ID: 25028866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for upper gastrointestinal submucosal or extraluminal solid mass lesions.
Rong L; Kida M; Yamauchi H; Okuwaki K; Miyazawa S; Iwai T; Kikuchi H; Watanabe M; Imaizumi H; Koizumi W
Dig Endosc; 2012 Sep; 24(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 22925290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
