368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24216383)
1. Novel sounds as a psychophysiological measure of listening effort in older listeners with and without hearing loss.
Bertoli S; Bodmer D
Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 May; 125(5):1030-41. PubMed ID: 24216383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of age and task difficulty on ERP responses to novel sounds presented during a speech-perception-in-noise test.
Bertoli S; Bodmer D
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):360-368. PubMed ID: 25840528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
Oates PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):399-415. PubMed ID: 12411773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Behavioral Measures of Listening Effort in School-Age Children: Examining the Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Hearing Loss, and Amplification.
McGarrigle R; Gustafson SJ; Hornsby BWY; Bess FH
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):381-392. PubMed ID: 29905670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech.
Martin BA; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):195-213. PubMed ID: 15809545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Listening Effort in Adults With Normal Hearing.
Picou EM; Gordon J; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 26372266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in Noise in Older Listeners: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Age.
Billings CJ; Penman TM; McMillan GP; Ellis EM
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):710-22. PubMed ID: 26502191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alexander G
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subjective and psychophysiological indexes of listening effort in a competing-talker task.
Mackersie CL; Cones H
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Feb; 22(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 21463566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cortical Correlates of Binaural Temporal Processing Deficits in Older Adults.
Eddins AC; Eddins DA
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):594-604. PubMed ID: 29135686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring listening effort: driving simulator versus simple dual-task paradigm.
Wu YH; Aksan N; Rizzo M; Stangl E; Zhang X; Bentler R
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):623-32. PubMed ID: 25083599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Verbal Response Times as a Potential Indicator of Cognitive Load During Conventional Speech Audiometry With Matrix Sentences.
Meister H; Rählmann S; Lemke U; Besser J
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518793255. PubMed ID: 30124111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech-in-noise representation in the aging midbrain and cortex: Effects of hearing loss.
Presacco A; Simon JZ; Anderson S
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213899. PubMed ID: 30865718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
