BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24216383)

  • 21. Psychometric Functions of Dual-Task Paradigms for Measuring Listening Effort.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Zhang X; Perkins J; Eilers E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):660-670. PubMed ID: 27438866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interference and enhancement effects on interaural time discrimination and level discrimination in listeners with normal hearing and those with hearing loss.
    Smith-Olinde L; Besing J; Koehnke J
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 15248807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Cortical Synchronization to Competing Speech during Selective Attention.
    Fuglsang SA; Märcher-Rørsted J; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 40(12):2562-2572. PubMed ID: 32094201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of various articulatory features of speech on cortical event-related potentials and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 20453651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on N1 and the mismatch negativity to speech sounds /ba/and/da.
    Martin BA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Apr; 42(2):271-86. PubMed ID: 10229446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Amos NE; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):600-10. PubMed ID: 24622352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study.
    Bianchi F; Wendt D; Wassard C; Maas P; Lunner T; Rosenbom T; Holmberg M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds/ba/and/da.
    Martin BA; Sigal A; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1585-99. PubMed ID: 9069627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of speaker age on speech recognition and perceived listening effort in older adults with hearing loss.
    McAuliffe MJ; Wilding PJ; Rickard NA; O'Beirne GA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):838-47. PubMed ID: 22232404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Auditory acclimatization and hearing aids: late auditory evoked potentials and speech recognition following unilateral and bilateral amplification.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3560-9. PubMed ID: 24907819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of hearing loss on heart rate variability and skin conductance measured during sentence recognition in noise.
    Mackersie CL; MacPhee IX; Heldt EW
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 25170782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Binaural processing and phonological awareness in Australian Indigenous children from the Northern Territory: A community based study.
    Sharma M; Wigglesworth G; Savage G; Demuth K
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Jan; 128():109702. PubMed ID: 31606681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Listening effort and perceived clarity for normal-hearing children with the use of digital noise reduction.
    Gustafson S; McCreery R; Hoover B; Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz P
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 24473240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Listening Effort and Speech Recognition with Frequency Compression Amplification for Children and Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Brennan MA; Lewis D; McCreery R; Kopun J; Alexander JM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):823-837. PubMed ID: 28972471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.