These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24216771)

  • 1. Laboratory and field study of the potential benefits of pinna cue-preserving hearing aids.
    Jensen NS; Neher T; Laugesen S; Johannesson RB; Kragelund L
    Trends Amplif; 2013; 17(3):171-88. PubMed ID: 24216771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part II--field tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 19773657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise Reduction Technologies for Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; DeVries S; Oleson J
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):805-822. PubMed ID: 30379683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contribution of spectral pinna cues for sound localization in children with congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss after hearing rehabilitation.
    Vogt K; Wasmann JW; Van Opstal AJ; Snik AFM; Agterberg MJH
    Hear Res; 2020 Jan; 385():107847. PubMed ID: 31786443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a pinna compensation algorithm for sound localization and speech perception in noise.
    Kuk F; Korhonen P; Lau C; Keenan D; Norgaard M
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 23275583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of coordinated compression and pinna compensation features on horizontal localization performance in hearing aid users.
    Korhonen P; Lau C; Kuk F; Keenan D; Schumacher J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 25597463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Left-right and front-back spatial hearing with multiple directional microphone configurations in modern hearing aids.
    Carette E; Van den Bogaert T; Laureyns M; Wouters J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):791-803. PubMed ID: 25405835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of CIC and BTE hearing aids for three-dimensional localization of speech.
    Best V; Kalluri S; McLachlan S; Valentine S; Edwards B; Carlile S
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Oct; 49(10):723-32. PubMed ID: 20515424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimum Audible Angles Measured with Simulated Normally-Sized and Oversized Pinnas for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Test Subjects.
    Rønne FM; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Pedersen JH
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():207-217. PubMed ID: 27080661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of Hearing Aid Use by Individuals with Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss (USNHL).
    Bishop CE; Hamadain E; Galster JA; Johnson MF; Spankovich C; Windmill I
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(10):941-949. PubMed ID: 29130442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS.
    Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):203-18. PubMed ID: 19194292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a BICROS System with a Directional Microphone in the Receiver and Transmitter.
    Valente M; Oeding K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):856-71. PubMed ID: 26554490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Localization and speech-identification ability of hearing-impaired listeners using phase-preserving amplification.
    Drennan WR; Gatehouse S; Howell P; Van Tasell D; Lund S
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):461-72. PubMed ID: 16230896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tracking of Noise Tolerance to Measure Hearing Aid Benefit.
    Kuk F; Seper E; Lau CC; Korhonen P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Sep; 28(8):698-707. PubMed ID: 28906241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ear asymmetries and asymmetric directional microphone hearing aid fittings.
    Cord MT; Surr RK; Walden BE; Dittberner AB
    Am J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 20(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 21764997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.