BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24217107)

  • 1. Data extraction from electronic health records - existing tools may be unreliable and potentially unsafe.
    Liaw ST; Taggart J; Yu H; de Lusignan S
    Aust Fam Physician; 2013 Nov; 42(11):820-3. PubMed ID: 24217107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electronic health record components and the quality of care.
    Keyhani S; Hebert PL; Ross JS; Federman A; Zhu CW; Siu AL
    Med Care; 2008 Dec; 46(12):1267-72. PubMed ID: 19300317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between use of electronic health record features and health care quality: results of a statewide survey.
    Poon EG; Wright A; Simon SR; Jenter CA; Kaushal R; Volk LA; Cleary PD; Singer JA; Tumolo AZ; Bates DW
    Med Care; 2010 Mar; 48(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 20125047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving electronic health record (EHR) accuracy and increasing compliance with health maintenance clinical guidelines through patient access and input.
    Staroselsky M; Volk LA; Tsurikova R; Pizziferri L; Lippincott M; Wald J; Bates DW
    Int J Med Inform; 2006; 75(10-11):693-700. PubMed ID: 16338169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The challenge of measuring quality of care from the electronic health record.
    Roth CP; Lim YW; Pevnick JM; Asch SM; McGlynn EA
    Am J Med Qual; 2009; 24(5):385-94. PubMed ID: 19482968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
    Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Collecting information on the quality of prescribing in primary care using semi-automatic data extraction from GPs' electronic medical records.
    Vandenberghe HE; Van Casteren V; Jonckheer P; Bastiaens H; Van der Heyden J; Lafontaine MF; De Clercq E
    Int J Med Inform; 2005 Jun; 74(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 15893259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computerized extraction of information on the quality of diabetes care from free text in electronic patient records of general practitioners.
    Voorham J; Denig P
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2007; 14(3):349-54. PubMed ID: 17329733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Julius--a template based supplementary electronic health record system.
    Chen R; Enberg G; Klein GO
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2007 May; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17474997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validating an ontology-based algorithm to identify patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in electronic health records.
    Rahimi A; Liaw ST; Taggart J; Ray P; Yu H
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Oct; 83(10):768-78. PubMed ID: 25011429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementing an integrated electronic outcomes and electronic health record process to create a foundation for clinical practice improvement.
    Deutscher D; Hart DL; Dickstein R; Horn SD; Gutvirtz M
    Phys Ther; 2008 Feb; 88(2):270-85. PubMed ID: 18042656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new quality improvement study every day? Using QTools to build quality improvement projects around primary care electronic medical record systems.
    Treweek S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1106-9. PubMed ID: 15360984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Access to EHR and access control at a moment in the past: a discussion of the need and an exploration of the consequences.
    Bakker A
    Int J Med Inform; 2004 Mar; 73(3):267-70. PubMed ID: 15066557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the validity of national quality measures for coronary artery disease using an electronic health record.
    Persell SD; Wright JM; Thompson JA; Kmetik KS; Baker DW
    Arch Intern Med; 2006 Nov; 166(20):2272-7. PubMed ID: 17101947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Which functionalities are available in the electronic health record systems used by French general practitioners? An assessment study of 15 systems.
    Darmon D; Sauvant R; Staccini P; Letrilliart L
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Jan; 83(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 24231269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interoperability of clinical decision-support systems and electronic health records using archetypes: a case study in clinical trial eligibility.
    Marcos M; Maldonado JA; Martínez-Salvador B; Boscá D; Robles M
    J Biomed Inform; 2013 Aug; 46(4):676-89. PubMed ID: 23707417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Giving patients granular control of personal health information: using an ethics 'Points to Consider' to inform informatics system designers.
    Meslin EM; Alpert SA; Carroll AE; Odell JD; Tierney WM; Schwartz PH
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Dec; 82(12):1136-43. PubMed ID: 24139626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The REUSE project: EHR as single datasource for biomedical research.
    El Fadly A; Lucas N; Rance B; Verplancke P; Lastic PY; Daniel C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 2):1324-8. PubMed ID: 20841899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research networks: can we use data from GPs' electronic health records?
    De Clercq E; Van Casteren V; Jonckheer P; Burggraeve P; Lafontaine MF; Vandenberghe H; Lorant V; Artoisenet C; Degroote K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():181-6. PubMed ID: 17108523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient accessible electronic health records: exploring recommendations for successful implementation strategies.
    Wiljer D; Urowitz S; Apatu E; DeLenardo C; Eysenbach G; Harth T; Pai H; Leonard KJ;
    J Med Internet Res; 2008 Oct; 10(4):e34. PubMed ID: 18974036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.