84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24217883)
1. [Measurement of functional independence: concordance of the assessments SINGER and FIM and consequences for the user].
Freidel K; Leisse M
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2014 Feb; 53(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 24217883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM).
Hamilton BB; Laughlin JA; Fiedler RC; Granger CV
Scand J Rehabil Med; 1994 Sep; 26(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 7801060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Interobserver reliability of the "Functional Independence Measure" (FIM) in patients with craniocerebral injuries].
Haas U; Mayer H; Evers GC
Pflege; 2002 Aug; 15(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 12244828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative validity and reliability study.
Kidd D; Stewart G; Baldry J; Johnson J; Rossiter D; Petruckevitch A; Thompson AJ
Disabil Rehabil; 1995 Jan; 17(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 7858276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Operationalization and feasibility of the early rehabilitation index ("lower-saxony early rehabilitation index")].
Rollnik JD; Neunzig HP; Seger W
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2012 Jun; 51(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 21626476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Suitability of the SINGER as a tool for assessment in outpatient neurological rehabilitation].
Pöppl D; Deck R; Gerdes N; Funke UN; Kringler W; Friedrich N; Kohlmann T; Reuther P
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2015 Feb; 54(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 25675320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Understanding the impact of cognitive impairment and disease severity on activities of daily living in MS patients with different disability levels.
Yazgan YZ; Tarakcı E; Gungor F; Kurtuncu M
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2021 Jan; 200():106398. PubMed ID: 33310534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the FONE FIM: Part II. Concurrent validity & influencing factors.
Chang WC; Chan C; Slaughter SE; Cartwright D
J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(4):259-85. PubMed ID: 9661724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The reliability and validity of the proposed axis V (disabilities) of ICD-10.
Daradkeh TK; Saad A
Br J Psychiatry; 1994 Nov; 165(5):683-5. PubMed ID: 7866686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identification of high-risk individuals for the development of disability in activities of daily living. A ten-year follow-up study.
den Ouden ME; Schuurmans MJ; Mueller-Schotte S; van der Schouw YT
Exp Gerontol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 23403381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Agreement of functional independence measure item scores in patients transferred from one rehabilitation setting to another.
Kohler F; Dickson H; Redmond H; Estell J; Connolly C
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2009 Dec; 45(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 20032905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Item response theory and its application in neurology. Measurement of activity limitations in neurologic patients].
Gauggel S; Böcker M; Zimmermann P; Privou C; Lutz D
Nervenarzt; 2004 Dec; 75(12):1179-86. PubMed ID: 15586265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel Index, the Functional Independence Measure, and the Modified Rankin Scale.
Kwon S; Hartzema AG; Duncan PW; Min-Lai S
Stroke; 2004 Apr; 35(4):918-23. PubMed ID: 14976324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [References for evaluation scales in quality assurance in rehabilitation--1. II. Measuring functional independence in rehabilitation with the Functional Independence Index].
de Langen EG; Frommelt P; Wiedmann KD; Amann J
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 1995 Feb; 34(1):IV-XI. PubMed ID: 7716333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of activities of daily living in multiple sclerosis.
Månsson E; Lexell J
Disabil Rehabil; 2004 May; 26(10):576-85. PubMed ID: 15204511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain.
Coster WJ; Haley SM; Andres PL; Ludlow LH; Bond TL; Ni PS
Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I62-72. PubMed ID: 14707756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A method for measuring quality of life through subjective weighting of functional status.
Stineman MG; Wechsler B; Ross R; Maislin G
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Apr; 84(4 Suppl 2):S15-22. PubMed ID: 12692767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring disability in Medicare home care patients: application of Rasch modeling to the outcome and assessment information set.
Fortinsky RH; Garcia RI; Joseph Sheehan T; Madigan EA; Tullai-McGuinness S
Med Care; 2003 May; 41(5):601-15. PubMed ID: 12719685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Instrument for the functional evaluation of disability rehabilitation. Study on the reliability and clinical experience with the use of functional independence measure].
Paolinelli C; González P; Doniez ME; Donoso T; Salinas V
Rev Med Chil; 2001 Jan; 129(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 11265202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with brain tumors: a preliminary report.
Huang ME; Wartella JE; Kreutzer JS
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Nov; 82(11):1540-6. PubMed ID: 11689973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
