BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24218332)

  • 1. Are interaural time and level differences represented by independent or integrated codes in the human auditory cortex?
    Edmonds BA; Krumbholz K
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Feb; 15(1):103-14. PubMed ID: 24218332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological responses to lateral shifts are not consistent with opponent-channel processing of interaural level differences.
    Ozmeral EJ; Eddins DA; Eddins AC
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 122(2):737-748. PubMed ID: 31242052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Independent or integrated processing of interaural time and level differences in human auditory cortex?
    Altmann CF; Terada S; Kashino M; Goto K; Mima T; Fukuyama H; Furukawa S
    Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():121-7. PubMed ID: 24709274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trading of dynamic interaural time and level difference cues and its effect on the auditory motion-onset response measured with electroencephalography.
    Altmann CF; Ueda R; Bucher B; Furukawa S; Ono K; Kashino M; Mima T; Fukuyama H
    Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():185-194. PubMed ID: 28756239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Processing of binaural spatial information in human auditory cortex: neuromagnetic responses to interaural timing and level differences.
    Johnson BW; Hautus MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2610-9. PubMed ID: 20466010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for cue-independent spatial representation in the human auditory cortex during active listening.
    Higgins NC; McLaughlin SA; Rinne T; Stecker GC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Sep; 114(36):E7602-E7611. PubMed ID: 28827357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for opponent-channel coding of interaural time differences in human auditory cortex.
    Magezi DA; Krumbholz K
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Oct; 104(4):1997-2007. PubMed ID: 20702739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrated processing of spatial cues in human auditory cortex.
    Salminen NH; Takanen M; Santala O; Lamminsalo J; Altoè A; Pulkki V
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():143-52. PubMed ID: 26074304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial processing in human auditory cortex: the effects of 3D, ITD, and ILD stimulation techniques.
    Palomäki KJ; Tiitinen H; Mäkinen V; May PJ; Alku P
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):364-79. PubMed ID: 16099350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Infant Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials to Lateralized Noise Shifts Produced by Changes in Interaural Time Difference.
    Small SA; Ishida IM; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 27505221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reduced temporal processing in older, normal-hearing listeners evident from electrophysiological responses to shifts in interaural time difference.
    Ozmeral EJ; Eddins DA; Eddins AC
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Dec; 116(6):2720-2729. PubMed ID: 27683889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Slow Temporal Integration Enables Robust Neural Coding and Perception of a Cue to Sound Source Location.
    Brown AD; Tollin DJ
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(38):9908-21. PubMed ID: 27656028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neuronal sensitivity to interaural time differences in the sound envelope in the auditory cortex of the pallid bat.
    Lohuis TD; Fuzessery ZM
    Hear Res; 2000 May; 143(1-2):43-57. PubMed ID: 10771183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of externalization and spatial cues on the generation of auditory brainstem responses and middle latency responses.
    Junius D; Riedel H; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):91-104. PubMed ID: 17270375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial Processing Is Frequency Specific in Auditory Cortex But Not in the Midbrain.
    Sollini J; Mill R; Sumner CJ
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 37(27):6588-6599. PubMed ID: 28559383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory cortex responses to interaural time differences in the envelope of low-frequency sound, recorded with MEG in young and older listeners.
    Ross B
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():22-39. PubMed ID: 30265860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human cortical representation of virtual auditory space: differences between sound azimuth and elevation.
    Fujiki N; Riederer KA; Jousmäki V; Mäkelä JP; Hari R
    Eur J Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 16(11):2207-13. PubMed ID: 12473088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The neural representation of an auditory spatial cue in the primate cortex.
    Undurraga JA; Luke R; Van Yper L; Monaghan JJM; McAlpine D
    Curr Biol; 2024 May; 34(10):2162-2174.e5. PubMed ID: 38718798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The spatio-temporal brain dynamics of processing and integrating sound localization cues in humans.
    Tardif E; Murray MM; Meylan R; Spierer L; Clarke S
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):161-76. PubMed ID: 16684510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cortical Representation of Interaural Time Difference Is Impaired by Deafness in Development: Evidence from Children with Early Long-term Access to Sound through Bilateral Cochlear Implants Provided Simultaneously.
    Easwar V; Yamazaki H; Deighton M; Papsin B; Gordon K
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(9):2349-2361. PubMed ID: 28123078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.