These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24218950)

  • 1. [Comparison of 3 microsurgical approaches to the treatment of varicocele: report of 120 cases].
    Shi Q; Zhu H; Wang XS; Wang PT; Hou SC
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Oct; 19(10):931-4. PubMed ID: 24218950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is microsurgical technique really necessary in inguinal or sub-inguinal surgical treatment of varicocele?
    Gulino G; D'Onofrio A; Palermo G; Antonucci M; Presicce F; Racioppi M; Bassi PF
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Jun; 83(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 21826877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical comparison of subinguinal and high inguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy for adolescent varicocele.
    Shiraishi K; Oka S; Matsuyama H
    Int J Urol; 2016 Apr; 23(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 26790833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of low ligation and high ligation procedures of varicocele.
    Khan M; Khan S; Pervez A; Nawaz H; Ahmed S; Tareen S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 May; 13(5):280-3. PubMed ID: 12757679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with and without testicular delivery.
    Ramasamy R; Schlegel PN
    Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1323-6. PubMed ID: 17169654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis and ligation of gubernacular veins: Evaluation of clinical effects].
    Yang YY; Huang W; Cao JJ; Wu HS; Cao M; Zhang Y; Jin XD
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2018 Mar; 24(3):226-230. PubMed ID: 30161308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Varicocelectomy for male infertility: a comparative study of open, laparoscopic and microsurgical approaches.
    Al-Said S; Al-Naimi A; Al-Ansari A; Younis N; Shamsodini A; A-sadiq K; Shokeir AA
    J Urol; 2008 Jul; 180(1):266-70. PubMed ID: 18499176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of experimental rat varicocele with and without microsurgery.
    Zhou T; Cao H; Chen G; Yang B; Sun Y
    BMC Urol; 2015 Mar; 15():19. PubMed ID: 25885464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Al-Kandari AM; Shabaan H; Ibrahim HM; Elshebiny YH; Shokeir AA
    Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):417-20. PubMed ID: 17382134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Laparoscopic spermatic vein occlusion with Hem-o-lock clips versus Palomo procedure for primary varicocele].
    Huang WD; Liang X; Zhang C; Lin L
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2012 Apr; 18(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 22574371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the role of varicocelectomy including external spermatic vein ligation in patients with scrotal pain.
    Karademir K; Senkul T; Baykal K; Ateş F; Işeri C; Erden D
    Int J Urol; 2005 May; 12(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 15948749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Varicocelectomy in adolescent boys: long-term experience with the Palomo procedure.
    Feber KM; Kass EJ
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1657-9; discussion 1659-60. PubMed ID: 18708215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microscopic internal spermatic-inferior epigastric vein anastomosis for treating left varicocele.
    Dou K; Yang Q; Song T; Zeng X; Yao J; Li Y
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2024 Oct; 56(10):3269-3276. PubMed ID: 38782814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microsurgical spermatico-epigastric venous anastomosis in the treatment of varicocele in children: assessment of long-term patency.
    Camoglio FS; Cervellione RM; Bruno C; Dipaola G; Chironi C; Corroppolo M; Procacci C; Ottolenghi A
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2003 Aug; 13(4):256-9. PubMed ID: 13680495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the results and complications of retroperitoneal, microsurgical subinguinal, and high inguinal approaches in the treatment of varicoceles.
    Shiraishi K; Oka S; Ito H; Matsuyama H
    J Androl; 2012; 33(6):1387-93. PubMed ID: 22700759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimal invasiveness and effectivity of subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a comparative study with retroperitoneal high and laparoscopic approaches.
    Watanabe M; Nagai A; Kusumi N; Tsuboi H; Nasu Y; Kumon H
    Int J Urol; 2005 Oct; 12(10):892-8. PubMed ID: 16323983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Treatment of varicocele by microsurgical varicocelectomy: report of 94 cases].
    Pan LJ; Pan F; Zhang XY; Liu Y; Zhang FL
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2012 May; 18(5):416-8. PubMed ID: 22741438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Treatment of idiopathic varicocele: comparative study of three techniques about 128 cases].
    Khouni H; Bouchiba N; Khelifa MM; Ben Ali M; Sebai A; Dali M; Charfi M; Chouchene A; El Kateb F; Bouhaouala H; Balti MH
    Tunis Med; 2011 Dec; 89(12):929-34. PubMed ID: 22198896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adolescent varicocele repair: long-term results and comparison of surgical techniques according to optical magnification use in 100 cases at a single university hospital.
    Cayan S; Acar D; Ulger S; Akbay E
    J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):2003-6; discussion 2006-7. PubMed ID: 16217378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasound-assisted microsurgical left spermatic-inferior epigastric vein anastomosis for treating nutcracker syndrome-associated varicocele.
    Hao J; Shi H; Xu H; Zhu J; Zhou J; Du T
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Nov; 51(11):1925-1932. PubMed ID: 31388902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.