BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24219392)

  • 1. Sequential unfolding of appraisals: EEG evidence for the interaction of novelty and pleasantness.
    van Peer JM; Grandjean D; Scherer KR
    Emotion; 2014 Feb; 14(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 24219392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of intrinsic pleasantness and goal conduciveness appraisals on somatovisceral responding: Somewhat similar, but not identical.
    Aue T; Scherer KR
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Jan; 86(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 21029762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sequential unfolding of novelty and pleasantness appraisals of odors: evidence from facial electromyography and autonomic reactions.
    Delplanque S; Grandjean D; Chrea C; Coppin G; Aymard L; Cayeux I; Margot C; Velazco MI; Sander D; Scherer KR
    Emotion; 2009 Jun; 9(3):316-28. PubMed ID: 19485609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regional and inter-regional theta oscillation during episodic novelty processing.
    Lee GT; Lee C; Kim KH; Jung KY
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Oct; 90():70-5. PubMed ID: 25014407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal dynamics of event-related potentials related to goal conduciveness and power appraisals.
    Gentsch K; Grandjean D; Scherer KR
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Oct; 50(10):1010-22. PubMed ID: 23829421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Appraisal-driven somatovisceral response patterning: effects of intrinsic pleasantness and goal conduciveness.
    Aue T; Scherer KR
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 18495321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brain dynamics of upstream perceptual processes leading to visual object recognition: a high density ERP topographic mapping study.
    Schettino A; Loeys T; Delplanque S; Pourtois G
    Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):1227-41. PubMed ID: 21237274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Appraisal frames of pleasant and unpleasant pictures alter emotional responses as reflected in self-report and facial electromyographic activity.
    Wu L; Winkler MH; Andreatta M; Hajcak G; Pauli P
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Aug; 85(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 22561511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The valence strength of unpleasant emotion modulates brain processing of behavioral inhibitory control: neural correlates.
    Yuan J; Meng X; Yang J; Yao G; Hu L; Yuan H
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Jan; 89(1):240-51. PubMed ID: 22056697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal dynamics and potential neural sources of goal conduciveness, control, and power appraisal.
    Gentsch K; Grandjean D; Scherer KR
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Dec; 112():77-93. PubMed ID: 26472279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The dynamics of EEG gamma responses to unpleasant visual stimuli: from local activity to functional connectivity.
    Martini N; Menicucci D; Sebastiani L; Bedini R; Pingitore A; Vanello N; Milanesi M; Landini L; Gemignani A
    Neuroimage; 2012 Apr; 60(2):922-32. PubMed ID: 22270349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related potential study of novelty processing abnormalities in autism.
    Sokhadze E; Baruth J; Tasman A; Sears L; Mathai G; El-Baz A; Casanova MF
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Mar; 34(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 19199028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neuronal generator patterns at scalp elicited by lateralized aversive pictures reveal consecutive stages of motivated attention.
    Kayser J; Tenke CE; Abraham KS; Alschuler DM; Alvarenga JE; Skipper J; Warner V; Bruder GE; Weissman MM
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():337-350. PubMed ID: 27263509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Novelty and target processing during an auditory novelty oddball: a simultaneous event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Strobel A; Debener S; Sorger B; Peters JC; Kranczioch C; Hoechstetter K; Engel AK; Brocke B; Goebel R
    Neuroimage; 2008 Apr; 40(2):869-883. PubMed ID: 18206391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence of emotion-antecedent appraisal checks in electroencephalography and facial electromyography.
    Coutinho E; Gentsch K; van Peer J; Scherer KR; Schuller BW
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0189367. PubMed ID: 29293572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Event related beta and gamma oscillatory responses during perception of affective pictures.
    Güntekin B; Tülay E
    Brain Res; 2014 Aug; 1577():45-56. PubMed ID: 24992292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binding neutral information to emotional contexts: Brain dynamics of long-term recognition memory.
    Ventura-Bort C; Löw A; Wendt J; Moltó J; Poy R; Dolcos F; Hamm AO; Weymar M
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 16(2):234-47. PubMed ID: 26530244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emotion recognition from sound stimuli based on back-propagation neural networks and electroencephalograms.
    Di GQ; Wu SX
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):994-1002. PubMed ID: 26328715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low spatial frequency filtering modulates early brain processing of affective complex pictures.
    Alorda C; Serrano-Pedraza I; Campos-Bueno JJ; Sierra-Vázquez V; Montoya P
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Nov; 45(14):3223-33. PubMed ID: 17681356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Must interesting things be pleasant? A test of competing appraisal structures.
    Turner SA; Silvia PJ
    Emotion; 2006 Nov; 6(4):670-4. PubMed ID: 17144758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.