220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24220463)
21. The effects of superstructure fit and loading on individual implant units: Part 2. The effects of loading a superstructure with varying degrees of fit.
Isa ZM; Hobkirk JA
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1996 Mar; 4(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 9171008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pre-load on oral implants after screw tightening fixed full prostheses: an in vivo study.
Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H; Vander Sloten J; De Cooman M; Puers R; Naert I
J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 28(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 11350577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Loading of bone surrounding implants through three-unit fixed partial denture fixation: a finite-element analysis based on in vitro and in vivo strain measurements.
Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16672032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Peri-implant biomechanical responses to standard, short-wide, and mini implants supporting single crowns under axial and off-axial loading (an in vitro study).
Kheiralla LS; Younis JF
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Feb; 40(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 22208865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The influence of mandibular deformation, implant numbers, and loading position on detected forces in abutments supporting fixed implant superstructures.
Hobkirk JA; Havthoulas TK
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Aug; 80(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 9710818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of tilted and short distal implants on axial forces and bending moments in implants supporting fixed dental prostheses: an in vitro study.
Ogawa T; Dhaliwal S; Naert I; Mine A; Kronstrom M; Sasaki K; Duyck J
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):566-73. PubMed ID: 21209995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of implant number, distribution and prosthesis material on loading on implants supporting fixed prostheses.
Ogawa T; Dhaliwal S; Naert I; Mine A; Kronstrom M; Sasaki K; Duyck J
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):525-31. PubMed ID: 20236236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks.
Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of the effect of an offset implant configuration in the posterior maxilla with external hexagon implant platform: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DAF; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CAA; Pellizzer EP
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28222876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Photoelastic analysis of cemented or screwed implant-supported prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Carvalho PS; Goiato MC
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 21851260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Photoelastic stress analysis in screwed and cemented implant-supported dentures with external hexagon implants.
Pellizzer EP; Tonella BP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Alves-Rezende MC
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1110-3. PubMed ID: 20613577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures.
Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 17927737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Deformation of implant abutments after framework connection using strain gauges.
Hollweg H; Jacques LB; da Silva Moura M; Bianco VC; Souza EA; Rubo JH
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 22568468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of two full-arch rehabilitations supported by four or five implants.
Francetti L; Cavalli N; Villa T; La Barbera L; Taschieri S; Corbella S; Del Fabbro M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(2):419-26. PubMed ID: 25830403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of prosthesis material on the loading of implants that support a fixed partial prosthesis: in vivo study.
Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H; Vander Sloten J; De Cooman M; Puers R; Naert I
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2000; 2(2):100-9. PubMed ID: 11359263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of crown/implant ratio and crown height space on stress distribution in unsplinted implant supporting restorations.
Nissan J; Ghelfan O; Gross O; Priel I; Gross M; Chaushu G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1934-9. PubMed ID: 21530042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Photoelastic Analysis on Different Retention Methods of Implant-Supported Prosthesis.
Pimentel AC; Manzi MR; Polo CI; Sendyk CL; da Graça Naclério-Homem M; Sendyk WR
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jun; 41(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 25198152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The influence of the location of load transfer on strains around implants supporting four unit cement-retained fixed prostheses: in vitro evaluation of axial versus off-set loading.
Cehreli MC; Iplikçioğlu H; Bilir OG
J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Apr; 29(4):394-400. PubMed ID: 11966975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
