266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24221921)
1. Effect of varying number of OSEM subsets on PET lesion detectability.
Morey AM; Kadrmas DJ
J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Dec; 41(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 24221921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental comparison of lesion detectability for four fully-3D PET reconstruction schemes.
Kadrmas DJ; Casey ME; Black NF; Hamill JJ; Panin VY; Conti M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Apr; 28(4):523-34. PubMed ID: 19272998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies.
Sah BR; Stolzmann P; Delso G; Wollenweber SD; Hüllner M; Hakami YA; Queiroz MA; Barbosa FG; von Schulthess GK; Pietsch C; Veit-Haibach P
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jan; 38(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 27755394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Penalized-Likelihood Estimation Reconstruction on a Digital Time-of-Flight PET/CT Scanner for
Lindström E; Sundin A; Trampal C; Lindsjö L; Ilan E; Danfors T; Antoni G; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 29449445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of time-of-flight on PET tumor detection.
Kadrmas DJ; Casey ME; Conti M; Jakoby BW; Lois C; Townsend DW
J Nucl Med; 2009 Aug; 50(8):1315-23. PubMed ID: 19617317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of time-of-flight PET on whole-body oncologic studies: a human observer lesion detection and localization study.
Surti S; Scheuermann J; El Fakhri G; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Lim R; Abi-Hatem N; Moussallem E; Benard F; Mankoff D; Karp JS
J Nucl Med; 2011 May; 52(5):712-9. PubMed ID: 21498523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accelerated time-of-flight (TOF) PET image reconstruction using TOF bin subsetization and TOF weighting matrix pre-computation.
Mehranian A; Kotasidis F; Zaidi H
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 61(3):1309-31. PubMed ID: 26796770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Using 2mm Voxels on Observer Performance for PET Lesion Detection.
Morey AM; Noo F; Kadrmas DJ
IEEE Trans Nucl Sci; 2016 Jun; 63(3):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 27499550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of whole-body oncologic PET with time-of-flight and point-spread function for the hybrid PET/MR system.
Shang K; Cui B; Ma J; Shuai D; Liang Z; Jansen F; Zhou Y; Lu J; Zhao G
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():70-75. PubMed ID: 28668434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using EQ·PET to reduce reconstruction-dependent variations in [
Vanhoutte M; Semah F; Lopes R; Jaillard A; Petyt G; Aziz AL; Lahousse H; Declerck J; Pasquier F; Spottiswoode B; Fahmi R
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(17):175002. PubMed ID: 31344691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Swensson R; Comtat C; Lin M; Villemagne V; Trébossen R
J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):276-90. PubMed ID: 12571221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System.
Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Macpherson RE; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1447-52. PubMed ID: 26159585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 4D numerical observer for lesion detection in respiratory-gated PET.
Lorsakul A; Li Q; Trott CM; Hoog C; Petibon Y; Ouyang J; Laine AF; El Fakhri G
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):102504. PubMed ID: 25281979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of acquisition geometry, image processing, and patient size on lesion detection in whole-body 18F-FDG PET.
El Fakhri G; Santos PA; Badawi RD; Holdsworth CH; Van Den Abbeele AD; Kijewski MF
J Nucl Med; 2007 Dec; 48(12):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18006613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Scan Time on Oncologic Lesion Detection in Whole-Body PET.
Kadrmas DJ; Oktay MB; Casey ME; Hamill JJ
IEEE Trans Nucl Sci; 2012 Oct; 59(5):1940-1947. PubMed ID: 23293380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative comparison between regularized time-of-flight and OSEM PET reconstructions for small 18F-FDG-avid lesions.
Chism CB; Ravizzini GC; Macapinlac HA; Pan T
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 28383318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvement in lesion detection with whole-body oncologic time-of-flight PET.
El Fakhri G; Surti S; Trott CM; Scheuermann J; Karp JS
J Nucl Med; 2011 Mar; 52(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 21321265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of PET/CT image quality using the GE 'Sharp IR' point-spread function reconstruction algorithm.
Vennart NJ; Bird N; Buscombe J; Cheow HK; Nowosinska E; Heard S
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):471-479. PubMed ID: 28394818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
