147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24222907)
1. Evaluation of wall correction factor of INER's air-kerma primary standard chamber and dose variation by source displacement for HDR ¹⁹²Ir brachytherapy.
Lee JH; Wang JN; Huang TT; Su SH; Chang BJ; Su CH; Hsu SM
Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():436979. PubMed ID: 24222907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Source geometry factors for HDR ¹⁹²Ir brachytherapy secondary standard well-type ionization chamber calibrations.
Shipley DR; Sander T; Nutbrown RF
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 60(6):2573-86. PubMed ID: 25761529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Air-kerma strength determination of an HDR
Smith BR; Micka JA; Aima M; DeWerd LA; Culberson WS
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):311-320. PubMed ID: 28102953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correction factors for source strength determination in HDR brachytherapy using the in-phantom method.
Ubrich F; Wulff J; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K
Z Med Phys; 2014 May; 24(2):138-52. PubMed ID: 24021956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The IPEM code of practice for determination of the reference air kerma rate for HDR (192)Ir brachytherapy sources based on the NPL air kerma standard.
Bidmead AM; Sander T; Locks SM; Lee CD; Aird EG; Nutbrown RF; Flynn A;
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(11):3145-59. PubMed ID: 20479510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determination of air-kerma strength for the 192Ir GammaMedplus iX pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy source.
Riley AD; Pike TL; Micka JA; Fulkerson RK; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071732. PubMed ID: 23822436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The feasibility study and characterization of a two-dimensional diode array in "magic phantom" for high dose rate brachytherapy quality assurance.
Espinoza A; Beeksma B; Petasecca M; Fuduli I; Porumb C; Cutajar D; Corde S; Jackson M; Lerch ML; Rosenfeld AB
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111702. PubMed ID: 24320410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Calibration coefficient of reference brachytherapy ionization chamber using analytical and Monte Carlo methods.
Kumar S; Srinivasan P; Sharma SD
Appl Radiat Isot; 2010 Jun; 68(6):1108-15. PubMed ID: 20079657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric characterization and output verification for conical brachytherapy surface applicators. Part II. High dose rate 192Ir sources.
Fulkerson RK; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):022104. PubMed ID: 24506636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A radiation quality correction factor k for well-type ionization chambers for the measurement of the reference air kerma rate of (60)Co HDR brachytherapy sources.
Schüller A; Meier M; Selbach HJ; Ankerhold U
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4285-94. PubMed ID: 26133626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Air kerma standard and measurement comparison on source strength determination for high-dose rate 192Ir brachytherapy in Taiwan.
Lee JH; Su SH; Hsieh MT; Chen IJ; Liang JA; Hsu SM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):100-2. PubMed ID: 21498859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric assessment of an air-filled balloon applicator in HDR vaginal cuff brachytherapy using the Monte Carlo method.
Jiang H; Badkul R; Pokhrel D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):101-107. PubMed ID: 29493101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric characteristics, air-kerma strength calibration and verification of Monte Carlo simulation for a new Ytterbium-169 brachytherapy source.
Perera H; Williamson JF; Li Z; Mishra V; Meigooni AS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Mar; 28(4):953-70. PubMed ID: 8138449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A generic high-dose rate (192)Ir brachytherapy source for evaluation of model-based dose calculations beyond the TG-43 formalism.
Ballester F; Carlsson Tedgren Å; Granero D; Haworth A; Mourtada F; Fonseca GP; Zourari K; Papagiannis P; Rivard MJ; Siebert FA; Sloboda RS; Smith RL; Thomson RM; Verhaegen F; Vijande J; Ma Y; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):3048-61. PubMed ID: 26127057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transit dose comparisons for
Giménez-Alventosa V; Vijande J; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J
J Radiol Prot; 2016 Dec; 36(4):858-864. PubMed ID: 27739408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of air-kerma strength determinations for HDR (192)Ir sources.
Rasmussen BE; Davis SD; Schmidt CR; Micka JA; Dewerd LA
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6721-9. PubMed ID: 22149854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Fricke dosimeter as an absorbed dose to water primary standard for Ir-192 brachytherapy.
El Gamal I; Cojocaru C; Mainegra-Hing E; McEwen M
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 60(11):4481-95. PubMed ID: 25988983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A generic TG-186 shielded applicator for commissioning model-based dose calculation algorithms for high-dose-rate
Ma Y; Vijande J; Ballester F; Tedgren ÅC; Granero D; Haworth A; Mourtada F; Fonseca GP; Zourari K; Papagiannis P; Rivard MJ; Siebert FA; Sloboda RS; Smith R; Chamberland MJP; Thomson RM; Verhaegen F; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5961-5976. PubMed ID: 28722180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of ambient pressure on well chamber response: Monte Carlo calculated results for the HDR 1000 plus.
Bohm TD; Griffin SL; DeLuca PM; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1103-14. PubMed ID: 15895595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A practical implementation of the 2010 IPEM high dose rate brachytherapy code of practice for the calibration of 192Ir sources.
Awunor OA; Lecomber AR; Richmond N; Walker C
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(16):5397-410. PubMed ID: 21804181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
