These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24223563)

  • 1. The acoustic and perceptual cues affecting melody segregation for listeners with a cochlear implant.
    Marozeau J; Innes-Brown H; Blamey PJ
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():790. PubMed ID: 24223563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of visual cues on difficulty ratings for segregation of musical streams in listeners with impaired hearing.
    Innes-Brown H; Marozeau J; Blamey P
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e29327. PubMed ID: 22195046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of visual cues on auditory stream segregation in musicians and non-musicians.
    Marozeau J; Innes-Brown H; Grayden DB; Burkitt AN; Blamey PJ
    PLoS One; 2010 Jun; 5(6):e11297. PubMed ID: 20585606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Kong YY; Cruz R; Jones JA; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 15064662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.
    Arehart KH; Croghan NB; Muralimanohar RK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 24441739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability.
    Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Impact of Pitch and Timbre Cues on Auditory Grouping and Stream Segregation.
    Oh Y; Zuwala JC; Salvagno CM; Tilbrook GA
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():725093. PubMed ID: 35087369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of aging and musicianship on the use of auditory streaming cues.
    Sauvé SA; Marozeau J; Rich Zendel B
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274631. PubMed ID: 36137151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal and spectral cues for musical timbre perception in electric hearing.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J; Epstein M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):981-94. PubMed ID: 21060140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users.
    Limb CJ; Roy AT
    Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 308():13-26. PubMed ID: 23665130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of the adaptive music perception test.
    Kirchberger MJ; Russo FA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 25350404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal and spectral contributions to musical instrument identification and discrimination among cochlear implant users.
    Prentiss SM; Friedland DR; Fullmer T; Crane A; Stoddard T; Runge CL
    World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 2(3):148-156. PubMed ID: 29204560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.
    Kang R; Nimmons GL; Drennan W; Longnion J; Ruffin C; Nie K; Won JH; Worman T; Yueh B; Rubinstein J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 19474735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.
    Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Nogaki G
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):302-19. PubMed ID: 17485980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory stream segregation of iterated rippled noises by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Shearer DE; Molis MR; Bennett KO; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):378. PubMed ID: 29390743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-based musical interval training program for Cochlear implant users and listeners with no known hearing loss.
    Bissmeyer SRS; Ortiz JR; Gan H; Goldsworthy RL
    Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():903924. PubMed ID: 35968373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual organization of sequential stimuli in cochlear implant listeners: A temporal processing approach.
    Saki N; Nikakhlagh S; Mirmomeni G; Bayat A
    Int Tinnitus J; 2019 Jan; 23(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 31469526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.