These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24223563)

  • 21. Perceptual organization of sequential stimuli in cochlear implant listeners: A temporal processing approach.
    Saki N; Nikakhlagh S; Mirmomeni G; Bayat A
    Int Tinnitus J; 2019 Jan; 23(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 31469526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Simulating the effects of spread of electric excitation on musical tuning and melody identification with a cochlear implant.
    Spahr AJ; Litvak LM; Dorman MF; Bohanan AR; Mishra LN
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 51(6):1599-606. PubMed ID: 18664681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of musical and linguistic components in recognition of real-world musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.
    Gfeller K; Jiang D; Oleson JJ; Driscoll V; Olszewski C; Knutson JF; Turner C; Gantz B
    J Music Ther; 2012; 49(1):68-101. PubMed ID: 22803258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia.
    Cooper WB; Tobey E; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):618-26. PubMed ID: 18469714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of Musical Training and Hearing Loss on Fundamental Frequency Discrimination and Temporal Fine Structure Processing: Psychophysics and Modeling.
    Bianchi F; Carney LH; Dau T; Santurette S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 20(3):263-277. PubMed ID: 30693416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Encoding a Melody Using Only Temporal Information for Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    Todd AE; Mertens G; Van de Heyning P; Landsberger DM
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517739745. PubMed ID: 29161987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of rhythm and melody on auditory stream segregation.
    Szalárdy O; Bendixen A; Böhm TM; Davies LA; Denham SL; Winkler I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1392-405. PubMed ID: 24606277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can You Hear Out the Melody? Testing Musical Scene Perception in Young Normal-Hearing and Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Siedenburg K; Röttges S; Wagener KC; Hohmann V
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520945826. PubMed ID: 32895034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant.
    Cousineau M; Demany L; Meyer B; Pressnitzer D
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):34-41. PubMed ID: 20674733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Role of Temporal Cues in Voluntary Stream Segregation for Cochlear Implant Users.
    Paredes-Gallardo A; Madsen SMK; Dau T; Marozeau J
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518773226. PubMed ID: 29766759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sequential stream segregation using temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implant recipients.
    Hong RS; Turner CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):291-9. PubMed ID: 19603885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sequential stream segregation in the absence of spectral cues.
    Vliegen J; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):339-46. PubMed ID: 9921660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Electro-Tactile Stimulation Enhances Cochlear-Implant Melody Recognition: Effects of Rhythm and Musical Training.
    Huang J; Lu T; Sheffield B; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):106-113. PubMed ID: 31884501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Auditory stream segregation by musical timbre: effects of static and dynamic acoustic attributes.
    Iverson P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Aug; 21(4):751-63. PubMed ID: 7643047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.
    McDermott HJ
    Trends Amplif; 2004; 8(2):49-82. PubMed ID: 15497033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of age and hearing loss on auditory stream segregation of speech sounds.
    David M; Tausend AN; Strelcyk O; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():118-128. PubMed ID: 29602593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.
    Gfeller K; Turner C; Oleson J; Zhang X; Gantz B; Froman R; Olszewski C
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 17485990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of Vibrotactile Stimulation on Auditory Timbre Perception for Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Verma T; Aker SC; Marozeau J
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165221138390. PubMed ID: 36789758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. From fragments to the whole: a comparison between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners in music perception and enjoyment.
    Alexander AJ; Bartel L; Friesen L; Shipp D; Chen J
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 21303594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Examination of spectral timbre cues and musical instrument identification in cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Lang-Roth R; Streicher B; Walger M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Mar; 15(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 24597635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.