BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24224406)

  • 1. Advanced age per se should not be an exclusion criterion for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.
    Santarpino G; Pfeiffer S; Vogt F; Hinzmann M; Concistrè G; Fischlein T
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 Jul; 22(4):455-9. PubMed ID: 24224406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation and conventional aortic valve replacement in octogenarians.
    Strauch JT; Scherner M; Haldenwang PL; Madershahian N; Pfister R; Kuhn EW; Liakopoulos OJ; Wippermann J; Wahlers T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Jul; 60(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 22547302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction on hospital outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement: results from a propensity-matched population of the Italian OBSERVANT multicenter study.
    Onorati F; D'Errigo P; Grossi C; Barbanti M; Ranucci M; Covello DR; Rosato S; Maraschini A; Santoro G; Tamburino C; Seccareccia F; Santini F; Menicanti L;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 147(2):568-75. PubMed ID: 24263007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is transapical aortic valve implantation really less invasive than minimally invasive aortic valve replacement?
    Zierer A; Wimmer-Greinecker G; Martens S; Moritz A; Doss M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Nov; 138(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 19740493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sutureless replacement versus transcatheter valve implantation in aortic valve stenosis: a propensity-matched analysis of 2 strategies in high-risk patients.
    Santarpino G; Pfeiffer S; Jessl J; Dell'Aquila AM; Pollari F; Pauschinger M; Fischlein T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 147(2):561-7. PubMed ID: 24280712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: a single-center experience.
    Silberman S; Abu Akr F; Bitran D; Almagor Y; Balkin J; Tauber R; Merin O
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 Jul; 22(4):448-54. PubMed ID: 24224405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lack of definite indication criteria for choosing between transcatheter implantation and surgical replacement of the aortic valve.
    De Feo M; Vicchio M; Della Corte A; Provenzano R; Giordano S; Amendolara F; Montibello M; Nappi G; Cotrufo M
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2013 Feb; 14(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 22157181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sutureless versus Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implant: A Propensity Score Matching Study.
    Santarpino G; Vogt F; Pfeiffer S; Dell'Aquila AM; Jessl J; Cuomo F; von Wardenburg C; Fischlein T; Pauschinger M; Schwab J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 May; 26(3):255-261. PubMed ID: 29092108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sutureless implantation of the perceval s aortic valve prosthesis through right anterior minithoracotomy.
    Gilmanov D; Miceli A; Bevilacqua S; Farneti P; Solinas M; Ferrarini M; Glauber M
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Dec; 96(6):2101-8. PubMed ID: 24054468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Perceval S aortic valve has the potential of shortening surgical time: does it also result in improved outcome?
    Santarpino G; Pfeiffer S; Concistré G; Grossmann I; Hinzmann M; Fischlein T
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Jul; 96(1):77-81; discussion 81-2. PubMed ID: 23673064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thirty-day outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgical valve replacement in patients with high-risk aortic stenosis: a matched comparison.
    Stöhr R; Dohmen G; Herpertz R; Brehmer K; Aktug O; Koos R; Altiok E; Stegemann E; Autschbach R; Marx N; Hoffmann R
    Coron Artery Dis; 2011 Dec; 22(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 22009042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conventional surgery, sutureless valves, and transapical aortic valve replacement: what is the best option for patients with aortic valve stenosis? A multicenter, propensity-matched analysis.
    D'Onofrio A; Rizzoli G; Messina A; Alfieri O; Lorusso R; Salizzoni S; Glauber M; Di Bartolomeo R; Besola L; Rinaldi M; Troise G; Gerosa G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Nov; 146(5):1065-70; discussion 1070-1. PubMed ID: 24021955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
    Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does a minimally invasive approach increase the incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement?
    Bakir I; Casselman FP; Onan B; Van Praet F; Vermeulen Y; Degrieck I
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Mar; 23(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 25076545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of life in high-risk patients: comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Amonn K; Stortecky S; Brinks H; Gahl B; Windecker S; Wenaweser P; Carrel T; Huber C
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Jan; 43(1):34-41; discussion 41-2. PubMed ID: 22531274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reoperative aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians-minimally invasive technique in the era of transcatheter valve replacement.
    Kaneko T; Loberman D; Gosev I; Rassam F; McGurk S; Leacche M; Cohn L
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 24183906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two alternative sutureless strategies for aortic valve replacement: a two-center experience.
    Concistrè G; Santarpino G; Pfeiffer S; Farneti P; Miceli A; Chiaramonti F; Solinas M; Glauber M; Fischlein T
    Innovations (Phila); 2013; 8(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 24145969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early and intermediate outcome after aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: Results of a multicenter study.
    Rubino AS; Santarpino G; De Praetere H; Kasama K; Dalén M; Sartipy U; Lahtinen J; Heikkinen J; Deste W; Pollari F; Svenarud P; Meuris B; Fischlein T; Mignosa C; Biancari F
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Sep; 148(3):865-71; discussion 871. PubMed ID: 24954175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis assessing clinical effectiveness and safety.
    Fusari M; Bona V; Muratori M; Salvi L; Salis S; Tamborini G; Biglioli P
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2012 Apr; 13(4):229-41. PubMed ID: 22367569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conventional aortic valve replacement for high-risk aortic stenosis patients not suitable for trans-catheter aortic valve implantation: feasibility and outcome.
    Dimarakis I; Rehman SM; Grant SW; Saravanan DM; Levy RD; Bridgewater B; Kadir I
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Sep; 40(3):743-8. PubMed ID: 21345690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.