278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24224536)
1. The new potential for understanding groundwater contaminant transport.
Hadley PW; Newell C
Ground Water; 2014; 52(2):174-86. PubMed ID: 24224536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mass discharge assessment at a brominated DNAPL site: Effects of known DNAPL source mass removal.
Johnston CD; Davis GB; Bastow TP; Woodbury RJ; Rao PS; Annable MD; Rhodes S
J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Aug; 164():100-13. PubMed ID: 24973505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Redistribution of contaminants by a fluctuating water table in a micro-porous, double-porosity aquifer: field observations and model simulations.
Fretwell BA; Burgess WG; Barker JA; Jefferies NL
J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Jun; 78(1-2):27-52. PubMed ID: 15949606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Field study of TCE diffusion profiles below DNAPL to assess aquitard integrity.
Parker BL; Cherry JA; Chapman SW
J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Oct; 74(1-4):197-230. PubMed ID: 15358493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of low-temperature seasonal aquifer thermal energy storage (SATES) systems on chlorinated solvent contaminated groundwater: modeling of spreading and degradation.
Zuurbier KG; Hartog N; Valstar J; Post VE; van Breukelen BM
J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Apr; 147():1-13. PubMed ID: 23435174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating four-dimensional time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography for monitoring DNAPL source zone remediation.
Power C; Gerhard JI; Karaoulis M; Tsourlos P; Giannopoulos A
J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Jul; 162-163():27-46. PubMed ID: 24854903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of mass depletion-mass flux reduction relationships during pumping to determine source zone mass of a reactive brominated-solvent DNAPL.
Johnston CD; Davis GB; Bastow TP; Annable MD; Trefry MG; Furness A; Geste Y; Woodbury RJ; Rao PS; Rhodes S
J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Jan; 144(1):122-37. PubMed ID: 23247401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element modeling of contaminant transport in soils including the effect of chemical reactions.
Javadi AA; Al-Najjar MM
J Hazard Mater; 2007 May; 143(3):690-701. PubMed ID: 17270344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Groundwater remediation: the next 30 years.
Hadley PW; Newell CJ
Ground Water; 2012; 50(5):669-78. PubMed ID: 22612359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the importance of diffusion and compound-specific mixing for groundwater transport: an investigation from pore to field scale.
Rolle M; Chiogna G; Hochstetler DL; Kitanidis PK
J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Oct; 153():51-68. PubMed ID: 23994908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dimensionless analysis of two analytical solutions for 3-D solute transport in groundwater.
Guyonnet D; Neville C
J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Nov; 75(1-2):141-53. PubMed ID: 15385102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sustainable in-well vapor stripping: A design, analytical model, and pilot study for groundwater remediation.
Sutton PT; Ginn TR
J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Dec; 171():32-41. PubMed ID: 25461885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The transport behaviour of elemental mercury DNAPL in saturated porous media: analysis of field observations and two-phase flow modelling.
Sweijen T; Hartog N; Marsman A; Keijzer TJ
J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Jun; 161():24-34. PubMed ID: 24748026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Defining near-surface groundwater flow regimes in the semi-arid glaciated plains of North America.
Hendry MJ; Barbour SL; Schmeling EE
Isotopes Environ Health Stud; 2016 Jun; 52(3):203-13. PubMed ID: 26606976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of deep vadose zone contaminant flux into groundwater: Approach and case study.
Oostrom M; Truex MJ; Last GV; Strickland CE; Tartakovsky GD
J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Jun; 189():27-43. PubMed ID: 27107320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling contaminant transport and remediation at an acrylonitrile spill site in Turkey.
Sengör SS; Unlü K
J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Jul; 150():77-92. PubMed ID: 23680827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of Multiple Data Assimilation Techniques in Groundwater Contaminant Transport Modeling.
Rajib AI; Assumaning GA; Chang SY; Addai EB
Water Environ Res; 2017 Nov; 89(11):1952-1960. PubMed ID: 29080564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dilution and volatilization of groundwater contaminant discharges in streams.
Aisopou A; Bjerg PL; Sonne AT; Balbarini N; Rosenberg L; Binning PJ
J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Jan; 172():71-83. PubMed ID: 25496819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Model-based evaluation of controlled-release systems in the remediation of dissolved plumes in groundwater.
Lee ES; Liu G; Schwartz FW; Kim Y; Ibaraki M
Chemosphere; 2008 May; 72(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 18377947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unsaturated zone leaching models for assessing risk to groundwater of contaminated sites.
Troldborg M; Binning PJ; Nielsen S; Kjeldsen P; Christensen AG
J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Feb; 105(1-2):28-37. PubMed ID: 19059673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
