287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24224949)
1. The interplay of bottom-up and top-down mechanisms in visual guidance during object naming.
Coco MI; Malcolm GL; Keller F
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1096-120. PubMed ID: 24224949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fixation and saliency during search of natural scenes: the case of visual agnosia.
Foulsham T; Barton JJ; Kingstone A; Dewhurst R; Underwood G
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1994-2003. PubMed ID: 19428433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What stands out in a scene? A study of human explicit saliency judgment.
Borji A; Sihite DN; Itti L
Vision Res; 2013 Oct; 91():62-77. PubMed ID: 23954536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does conspicuity enhance distraction? Saliency and eye landing position when searching for objects.
Foulsham T; Underwood G
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1088-98. PubMed ID: 19142829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Salience of the lambs: a test of the saliency map hypothesis with pictures of emotive objects.
Humphrey K; Underwood G; Lambert T
J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 22279240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
Wei P; Zhou X
Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The time course of name retrieval during multiple-object naming: evidence from extrafoveal-on-foveal effects.
Malpass D; Meyer AS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):523-37. PubMed ID: 20192547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modeling eye movements in visual agnosia with a saliency map approach: bottom-up guidance or top-down strategy?
Foulsham T; Barton JJ; Kingstone A; Dewhurst R; Underwood G
Neural Netw; 2011 Aug; 24(6):665-77. PubMed ID: 21316191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing.
Nuthmann A; Henderson JM
J Vis; 2010 Jul; 10(8):20. PubMed ID: 20884595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ERP correlates of spatially incongruent object identification during scene viewing: contextual expectancy versus simultaneous processing.
Demiral SB; Malcolm GL; Henderson JM
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1271-85. PubMed ID: 22391475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence for two distinct mechanisms directing gaze in natural scenes.
Mackay M; Cerf M; Koch C
J Vis; 2012 Apr; 12(4):9. PubMed ID: 22510977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is attention necessary for object identification? Evidence from eye movements during the inspection of real-world scenes.
Underwood G; Templeman E; Lamming L; Foulsham T
Conscious Cogn; 2008 Mar; 17(1):159-70. PubMed ID: 17222564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Top-down attention based on object representation and incremental memory for knowledge building and inference.
Kim B; Ban SW; Lee M
Neural Netw; 2013 Oct; 46():9-22. PubMed ID: 23624577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sustained attention in language production: an individual differences investigation.
Jongman SR; Roelofs A; Meyer AS
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):710-30. PubMed ID: 25214187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the temporal relation of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms during guidance of attention.
Wykowska A; Schubö A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):640-54. PubMed ID: 19309292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.
Võ ML; Henderson JM
J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):24.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The maturation of eye movement behavior: scene viewing characteristics in children and adults.
Helo A; Pannasch S; Sirri L; Rämä P
Vision Res; 2014 Oct; 103():83-91. PubMed ID: 25152319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Semantic relatedness among objects promotes the activation of multiple phonological codes during object naming.
Oppermann F; Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H; Gorges F
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):356-70. PubMed ID: 19557668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Semantic context and visual feature effects in object naming: an fMRI study using arterial spin labeling.
Hocking J; McMahon KL; de Zubicaray GI
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1571-83. PubMed ID: 18823254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interesting objects are visually salient.
Elazary L; Itti L
J Vis; 2008 Mar; 8(3):3.1-15. PubMed ID: 18484809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
