BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24225457)

  • 21. Why don't all animals avoid inbreeding?
    Pike VL; Cornwallis CK; Griffin AS
    Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Aug; 288(1956):20211045. PubMed ID: 34344184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Testing predictions of inclusive fitness theory in inbreeding relatives with biparental care.
    Gow EA; Arcese P; Dagenais D; Sardell RJ; Wilson S; Reid JM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Dec; 286(1916):20191933. PubMed ID: 31795864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mate choice, genetic incompatibility, and outbreeding in the ornate dragon lizard, Ctenophorus ornatus.
    LeBas NR
    Evolution; 2002 Feb; 56(2):371-7. PubMed ID: 11926505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mutual mate choice: when it pays both sexes to avoid inbreeding.
    Lihoreau M; Zimmer C; Rivault C
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3365. PubMed ID: 18843373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Close-kin mating, but not inbred parents, reduces hatching rates and offspring quality in a threatened tortoise.
    Yuan ML; White KN; Rothermel BB; Zamudio KR; Tuberville TD
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Oct; 32(10):1152-1162. PubMed ID: 31397924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assortative mating for relatedness in a large naturally occurring population of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Robinson SP; Kennington WJ; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Apr; 25(4):716-25. PubMed ID: 22321157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evidence of multiple paternity and mate selection for inbreeding avoidance in wild eastern chipmunks.
    Bergeron P; Réale D; Humphries MM; Garant D
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Aug; 24(8):1685-94. PubMed ID: 21585586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Paternal genetic effects on offspring fitness are context dependent within the extrapair mating system of a socially monogamous passerine.
    Schmoll T; Dietrich V; Winkel W; Epplen JT; Schurr F; Lubjuhn T
    Evolution; 2005 Mar; 59(3):645-57. PubMed ID: 15856706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Banded mongooses avoid inbreeding when mating with members of the same natal group.
    Sanderson JL; Wang J; Vitikainen EI; Cant MA; Nichols HJ
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Jul; 24(14):3738-51. PubMed ID: 26095171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Low level of extra-pair paternity between nearest neighbors results from female preference for high-quality males in the yellow-rumped flycatcher (Ficedula zanthopygia).
    E M; Gong Y; Yu J; Zhang S; Fan Q; Jiang Y; Wang H
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0172713. PubMed ID: 28257431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Demographic mechanisms of inbreeding adjustment through extra-pair reproduction.
    Reid JM; Duthie AB; Wolak ME; Arcese P
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Jul; 84(4):1029-40. PubMed ID: 25645743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mate choice promotes inbreeding avoidance in the two-spotted spider mite.
    Tien NS; Massourakis G; Sabelis MW; Egas M
    Exp Appl Acarol; 2011 Jun; 54(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 21400191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. No evidence for MHC class I-based disassortative mating in a wild population of great tits.
    Sepil I; Radersma R; Santure AW; De Cauwer I; Slate J; Sheldon BC
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 28(3):642-54. PubMed ID: 25661713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Inbreeding avoidance under different null models of random mating in the great tit.
    Szulkin M; Zelazowski P; Nicholson G; Sheldon BC
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 Jul; 78(4):778-88. PubMed ID: 19383076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. No evidence of inbreeding avoidance despite demonstrated survival costs in a polygynous rodent.
    Olson LE; Blumstein DT; Pollinger JR; Wayne RK
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Feb; 21(3):562-71. PubMed ID: 22145620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multiple paternity in a lek mating system: Females mate multiply when they choose inexperienced sires.
    Rivers PR; DuVal EH
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 May; 89(5):1142-1152. PubMed ID: 31785099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of mate preference and laying order on maternal allocation in a monogamous parrot species with extreme hatching asynchrony.
    Lahaye SE; Eens M; Iserbyt A; Groothuis TG; de Vries B; Müller W; Pinxten R
    Horm Behav; 2015 May; 71():49-59. PubMed ID: 25870020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Female-biased sex allocation and lack of inbreeding avoidance in
    Sinotte VM; Conlon BH; Seibel E; Schwitalla JW; de Beer ZW; Poulsen M; Bos N
    Ecol Evol; 2021 May; 11(10):5598-5605. PubMed ID: 34026032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genetic benefits of mate choice separated from differential maternal investment in red junglefowl (Gallus gallus).
    Parker TH
    Evolution; 2003 Sep; 57(9):2157-65. PubMed ID: 14575335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Insects and incest: Sib-mating tolerance in natural populations of a parasitoid wasp.
    Collet M; Amat I; Sauzet S; Auguste A; Fauvergue X; Mouton L; Desouhant E
    Mol Ecol; 2020 Feb; 29(3):596-609. PubMed ID: 31850599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.