These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24226125)

  • 1. Selection system efficiencies for computer simulated progeny test field designs in loblolly pine.
    Loo-Dinkins JA; Tauer CG; Lambeth CC
    Theor Appl Genet; 1990 Jan; 79(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 24226125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comment on "Selection system efficiencies for computer-simulated progeny test field designs in loblolly pine" J. A. Loo-Dinkins, C. G. Tauer and C. C. Lambeth.
    Burdon RD
    Theor Appl Genet; 1991 Jan; 81(1):139. PubMed ID: 24221171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Plot size for progeny selection in maize (Zea mays L.).
    Chaves LJ; de Miranda Filho JB
    Theor Appl Genet; 1992 Sep; 84(7-8):963-70. PubMed ID: 24201501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic effects on total phenolics, condensed tannins and non-structural carbohydrates in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) needles.
    Aspinwall MJ; King JS; Booker FL; McKeand SE
    Tree Physiol; 2011 Aug; 31(8):831-42. PubMed ID: 21831860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficiency of check-plot designs in unreplicated field trials.
    Chandra S
    Theor Appl Genet; 1994 Jul; 88(5):618-20. PubMed ID: 24186119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soil nitrate leaching in silvopastures compared with open pasture and pine plantation.
    Bambo SK; Nowak J; Blount AR; Long AJ; Osiecka A
    J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(5):1870-7. PubMed ID: 19643752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Paired comparison of water, energy and carbon exchanges over two young maritime pine stands (Pinus pinaster Ait.): effects of thinning and weeding in the early stage of tree growth.
    Moreaux V; Lamaud E; Bosc A; Bonnefond JM; Medlyn BE; Loustau D
    Tree Physiol; 2011 Sep; 31(9):903-21. PubMed ID: 21724584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Soil incorporation of logging residue affects fine-root and mycorrhizal root-tip dynamics of young loblolly pine clones.
    Pritchard SG; Maier CA; Johnsen KH; Grabman AJ; Chalmers AP; Burke MK
    Tree Physiol; 2010 Oct; 30(10):1299-310. PubMed ID: 20668289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of dairy cattle breeding designs that use genomic selection.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):493-500. PubMed ID: 21183061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Leaf-level gas-exchange uniformity and photosynthetic capacity among loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) genotypes of contrasting inherent genetic variation.
    Aspinwall MJ; King JS; McKeand SE; Domec JC
    Tree Physiol; 2011 Jan; 31(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 21389004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
    Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1216-24. PubMed ID: 23217224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic and economic responses for within-family marker-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Spelman RJ; Garrick DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Nov; 81(11):2942-50. PubMed ID: 9839238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incorporation of discrete genotype effects for multiple genes into animal model evaluations when only a small fraction of the population has been genotyped.
    Baruch E; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Nov; 91(11):4365-71. PubMed ID: 18946142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental designs for evaluation of genetic variability and selection of ancient grapevine varieties: a simulation study.
    Gonçalves E; St Aubyn A; Martins A
    Heredity (Edinb); 2010 Jun; 104(6):552-62. PubMed ID: 19904297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Back to nature: ecological genomics of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda, Pinaceae).
    Eckert AJ; Bower AD; González-Martínez SC; Wegrzyn JL; Coop G; Neale DB
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3789-805. PubMed ID: 20723060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mating system and pollen gene flow in Mediterranean maritime pine.
    de-Lucas AI; Robledo-Arnuncio JJ; Hidalgo E; González-Martínez SC
    Heredity (Edinb); 2008 Apr; 100(4):390-9. PubMed ID: 18212806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Potential improvements in rate of genetic gain from marker-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Meuwissen TH; Van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 1992 Jun; 75(6):1651-9. PubMed ID: 1500565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.