192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24228248)
1. A review for detecting gene-gene interactions using machine learning methods in genetic epidemiology.
Koo CL; Liew MJ; Mohamad MS; Salleh AH
Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():432375. PubMed ID: 24228248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Machine learning for detecting gene-gene interactions: a review.
McKinney BA; Reif DM; Ritchie MD; Moore JH
Appl Bioinformatics; 2006; 5(2):77-88. PubMed ID: 16722772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of approaches for machine-learning optimization of neural networks for detecting gene-gene interactions in genetic epidemiology.
Motsinger-Reif AA; Dudek SM; Hahn LW; Ritchie MD
Genet Epidemiol; 2008 May; 32(4):325-40. PubMed ID: 18265411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Machine learning approaches for the discovery of gene-gene interactions in disease data.
Upstill-Goddard R; Eccles D; Fliege J; Collins A
Brief Bioinform; 2013 Mar; 14(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 22611119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of neural network architecture using genetic programming improves detection and modeling of gene-gene interactions in studies of human diseases.
Ritchie MD; White BC; Parker JS; Hahn LW; Moore JH
BMC Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 4():28. PubMed ID: 12846935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Epistasis Analysis: Classification Through Machine Learning Methods.
Liu L; Wong KC
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2212():337-345. PubMed ID: 33733366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A support vector machine approach for detecting gene-gene interaction.
Chen SH; Sun J; Dimitrov L; Turner AR; Adams TS; Meyers DA; Chang BL; Zheng SL; Grönberg H; Xu J; Hsu FC
Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 32(2):152-67. PubMed ID: 17968988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Application and prospects of hyperspectral imaging and deep learning in traditional Chinese medicine in context of AI and industry 4.0].
Yi T; Lin C; En-Ci J; Ji-Zhong Y
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 45(22):5438-5442. PubMed ID: 33350203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Brief Survey on Machine Learning in Epistasis.
Chicco D; Faultless T
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2212():169-179. PubMed ID: 33733356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The rise and fall of supervised machine learning techniques.
Jensen LJ; Bateman A
Bioinformatics; 2011 Dec; 27(24):3331-2. PubMed ID: 22101152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. SVM-based generalized multifactor dimensionality reduction approaches for detecting gene-gene interactions in family studies.
Fang YH; Chiu YF
Genet Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 36(2):88-98. PubMed ID: 22851472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detecting, characterizing, and interpreting nonlinear gene-gene interactions using multifactor dimensionality reduction.
Moore JH
Adv Genet; 2010; 72():101-16. PubMed ID: 21029850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Application of support vector machine in the detection of early cancer].
Gao Z; Gong J; Qin Q; Lin J
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 22(5):1045-8. PubMed ID: 16294750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Machine learning applications to neuroimaging for glioma detection and classification: An artificial intelligence augmented systematic review.
Buchlak QD; Esmaili N; Leveque JC; Bennett C; Farrokhi F; Piccardi M
J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 89():177-198. PubMed ID: 34119265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A flexible computational framework for detecting, characterizing, and interpreting statistical patterns of epistasis in genetic studies of human disease susceptibility.
Moore JH; Gilbert JC; Tsai CT; Chiang FT; Holden T; Barney N; White BC
J Theor Biol; 2006 Jul; 241(2):252-61. PubMed ID: 16457852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of methods for classifying clinical samples based on proteomics data: a case study for statistical and machine learning approaches.
Sampson DL; Parker TJ; Upton Z; Hurst CP
PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e24973. PubMed ID: 21969867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Artificial intelligence in drug combination therapy.
Tsigelny IF
Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jul; 20(4):1434-1448. PubMed ID: 29438494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of genetic heterogeneity and epistasis in bladder cancer susceptibility and outcome: a learning classifier system approach.
Urbanowicz RJ; Andrew AS; Karagas MR; Moore JH
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013; 20(4):603-12. PubMed ID: 23444013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Machine learning applications to clinical decision support in neurosurgery: an artificial intelligence augmented systematic review.
Buchlak QD; Esmaili N; Leveque JC; Farrokhi F; Bennett C; Piccardi M; Sethi RK
Neurosurg Rev; 2020 Oct; 43(5):1235-1253. PubMed ID: 31422572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel artificial neural network method for biomedical prediction based on matrix pseudo-inversion.
Cai B; Jiang X
J Biomed Inform; 2014 Apr; 48():114-21. PubMed ID: 24361387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
