These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24228975)

  • 21. Spine journals: is reviewer agreement on publication recommendations greater than would be expected by chance?
    Weiner BK; Weiner JP; Smith HE
    Spine J; 2010 Mar; 10(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 20207330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Mar; 6():12. PubMed ID: 16539705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Authors' Submission Toolkit: a practical guide to getting your research published.
    Chipperfield L; Citrome L; Clark J; David FS; Enck R; Evangelista M; Gonzalez J; Groves T; Magrann J; Mansi B; Miller C; Mooney LA; Murphy A; Shelton J; Walson PD; Weigel A
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2010 Aug; 26(8):1967-82. PubMed ID: 20569069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do readers and peer reviewers agree on manuscript quality?
    Justice AC; Berlin JA; Fletcher SW; Fletcher RH; Goodman SN
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 8015119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prepublication review of medical ethics research: cause for concern.
    Landy DC; Coverdale JH; McCullough LB; Sharp RR
    Acad Med; 2009 Apr; 84(4):495-7. PubMed ID: 19318788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reviewer bias: a blinded experimental study.
    Ernst E; Resch KL
    J Lab Clin Med; 1994 Aug; 124(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 8051481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ethical concerns of nursing reviewers: an international survey.
    Broome M; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH; Baggs JG
    Nurs Ethics; 2010 Nov; 17(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 21097972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
    Groenvold M
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Role of the manuscript reviewer.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Oct; 50(10):931-3; quiz 934. PubMed ID: 19907880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi-rater study.
    Alam M; Kim NA; Havey J; Rademaker A; Ratner D; Tregre B; West DP; Coleman WP
    Br J Dermatol; 2011 Sep; 165(3):563-7. PubMed ID: 21623749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Peer review at the American Journal of Roentgenology: how reviewer and manuscript characteristics affected editorial decisions on 196 major papers.
    Kliewer MA; DeLong DM; Freed K; Jenkins CB; Paulson EK; Provenzale JM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1545-50. PubMed ID: 15547189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Editors' requests of peer reviewers: a study and a proposal.
    Frank E
    Prev Med; 1996; 25(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 8860274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Proposing a manuscript peer-review checklist.
    Duchesne S; Jannin P
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):1783-7. PubMed ID: 18053748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals.
    Azer SA; Ramani S; Peterson R
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(9):698-704. PubMed ID: 22643022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Characteristics of peer reviewed clinical medicine journals.
    Eldredge J
    Med Ref Serv Q; 1999; 18(2):13-26. PubMed ID: 10557841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development of a case report review instrument.
    Ramulu VG; Levine RB; Hebert RS; Wright SM
    Int J Clin Pract; 2005 Apr; 59(4):457-61. PubMed ID: 15853865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact and perceived value of journal reporting guidelines among Radiology authors and reviewers.
    Dewey M; Levine D; Bossuyt PM; Kressel HY
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Aug; 29(8):3986-3995. PubMed ID: 30694365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Revision of manuscripts for scholarly publication.
    Dowd SB; McElveny C
    Radiol Technol; 1997; 69(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 9323765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reviewing the reviewers: comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology.
    Kliewer MA; Freed KS; DeLong DM; Pickhardt PJ; Provenzale JM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1731-5. PubMed ID: 15908521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
    Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.