323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24231134)
1. Comparison of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Ibáñez B; Pérez-Benavente A; Martínez-Gómez X; Colás E; Sánchez-Iglesias JL; Cabrera-Díaz S; Puig-Puig O; Magrina JF; Gil-Moreno A
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 24231134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technical development and results of left extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer.
Dargent D; Ansquer Y; Mathevet P
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Apr; 77(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 10739695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Para-aortic lymph node surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: comparison between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy.
Loverix L; Salihi RR; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Concin N; Han S; van Gorp T; Vergote I
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Apr; 30(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 32079714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy: Development of a technique.
Magrina JF; Kho R; Montero RP; Magtibay PM; Pawlina W
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 19157527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancers: feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of isolated and combined procedures.
Bats AS; Mimouni M; Bensaïd C; Seror J; Douay-Hauser N; Nos C; Lécuru F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1486-92. PubMed ID: 25191875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implications of extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy to the left renal vein in locally advanced cervical cancer. A Spanish multicenter study.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Franco S; Torné A; Benito V; Hernández A; Lago V; Rovira R; Acosta Ú; Agustí N; Gil-Moreno A;
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):287-293. PubMed ID: 32467055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single-port laparoscopy and extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy: about fourteen consecutive cases.
Gouy S; Kane A; Uzan C; Gauthier T; Gilmore J; Morice P
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Nov; 123(2):329-32. PubMed ID: 21820162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multi-center experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
Fastrez M; Goffin F; Vergote I; Vandromme J; Petit P; Leunen K; Degueldre M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Aug; 92(8):895-901. PubMed ID: 23590725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic paraaortic surgical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer: a single-center experience.
Vázquez-Vicente D; Fernández Del Bas B; García Villayzán J; Di Fiore HA; Luna Tirado J; Casado Echarren V; García-Foncillas J; Plaza Arranz J; Chiva L
Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Nov; 20(11):1455-1459. PubMed ID: 29671223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility of extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy.
Nagao S; Fujiwara K; Kagawa R; Kozuka Y; Oda T; Maehata K; Ishikawa H; Koike H; Kohno I
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Nov; 103(2):732-5. PubMed ID: 16808966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical outcome of extraperitoneal paraaortic lymph node dissections compared with transperitoneal approach in gynecologic cancer patients.
Morales S; Zapardiel I; Grabowski JP; Hernandez A; Diestro MD; Gonzalez-Benitez C; De Santiago J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 23680520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (TIPAL).
Coronado PJ; Fasero M; Magrina JF; Herraiz MA; Vidart JA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):674-81. PubMed ID: 24486680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: extraperitoneal versus laparoscopic approach.
Larciprete G; Casalino B; Segatore MF; Jarvis S; Catarinella V; Cirese E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jun; 126(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 16359771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
