BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24231269)

  • 41. Unintended adverse consequences of introducing electronic health records in residential aged care homes.
    Yu P; Zhang Y; Gong Y; Zhang J
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Sep; 82(9):772-88. PubMed ID: 23770027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of user adoption during three module deployments of region-wide electronic patient record systems.
    Janols R; Lind T; Göransson B; Sandblad B
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Jun; 83(6):438-49. PubMed ID: 24630924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Security requirements in EHR systems and archives.
    Ruotsalainen P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 103():453-8. PubMed ID: 15747955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Analysis of metrics for the usability evaluation of electronic health record systems.
    Kopanitsa G; Tsvetkova Z; Veseli H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 174():129-33. PubMed ID: 22491126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Functions of an electronic health record.
    Uckert F; Ataian M; Görz M; Prokosch HU
    Int J Comput Dent; 2002; 5(2-3):125-32. PubMed ID: 12680044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The challenge of measuring quality of care from the electronic health record.
    Roth CP; Lim YW; Pevnick JM; Asch SM; McGlynn EA
    Am J Med Qual; 2009; 24(5):385-94. PubMed ID: 19482968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Access to EHR and access control at a moment in the past: a discussion of the need and an exploration of the consequences.
    Bakker A
    Int J Med Inform; 2004 Mar; 73(3):267-70. PubMed ID: 15066557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Completeness, accuracy, and computability of National Quality Forum-specified eMeasures.
    Amster A; Jentzsch J; Pasupuleti H; Subramanian KG
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Mar; 22(2):409-16. PubMed ID: 25326598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Physician experiences transitioning between an older versus newer electronic health record for electronic prescribing.
    Abramson EL; Patel V; Malhotra S; Pfoh ER; Nena Osorio S; Cheriff A; Cole CL; Bunce A; Ash J; Kaushal R
    Int J Med Inform; 2012 Aug; 81(8):539-48. PubMed ID: 22465355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessing performance of an Electronic Health Record (EHR) using Cognitive Task Analysis.
    Saitwal H; Feng X; Walji M; Patel V; Zhang J
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Jul; 79(7):501-6. PubMed ID: 20452274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An effort to improve electronic health record medication list accuracy between visits: patients' and physicians' response.
    Staroselsky M; Volk LA; Tsurikova R; Newmark LP; Lippincott M; Litvak I; Kittler A; Wang T; Wald J; Bates DW
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 Mar; 77(3):153-60. PubMed ID: 17434337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Electronic patient record systems and the general practitioner: an evaluation study.
    Mäkelä K; Virjo I; Aho J; Kalliola P; Koivukoski AM; Kurunmäki H; Kähärä M; Uusitalo L; Valli M; Vuotari V; Ylinen S
    J Telemed Telecare; 2005; 11 Suppl 2():S66-8. PubMed ID: 16375802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Medical guidelines presentation and comparing with Electronic Health Record.
    Veselý A; Zvárová J; Peleska J; Buchtela D; Anger Z
    Int J Med Inform; 2006; 75(3-4):240-5. PubMed ID: 16165396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Electronic health systems: challenges faced by hospital-based providers.
    Agno CF; Guo KL
    Health Care Manag (Frederick); 2013; 32(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 23903942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The impact of an electronic health record transition on a glaucoma subspecialty practice.
    Pandit RR; Boland MV
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Apr; 120(4):753-60. PubMed ID: 23352195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. EHR adoption among ambulatory care teams.
    Barker PW; Heisey-Grove DM
    Am J Manag Care; 2015 Dec; 21(12):894-9. PubMed ID: 26671701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Is it possible for nurses and doctors to form a useful clinical overview of an EHR?
    Neve K; Kragh Iversen R; Andersen CK
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():314-9. PubMed ID: 17102271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Standards-based, open-source electronic health record systems: a desirable future for the U.S. health industry.
    Yellowlees PM; Marks SL; Hogarth M; Turner S
    Telemed J E Health; 2008 Apr; 14(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 18570554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Composite quality of care scores, electronic health record maturity models, and their associations; preliminary literature review results.
    Joukes E; de Keizer N; Cornet R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():981. PubMed ID: 23920755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Does adoption of electronic health records improve organizational performances of hospital surgical units? Results from the French e-SI (PREPS-SIPS) study.
    Plantier M; Havet N; Durand T; Caquot N; Amaz C; Philip I; Biron P; Perrier L
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Feb; 98():47-55. PubMed ID: 28034412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.