These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24231273)

  • 1. Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial.
    Moojen WA; Arts MP; Jacobs WC; van Zwet EW; van den Akker-van Marle ME; Koes BW; Vleggeert-Lankamp CL; Peul WC;
    BMJ; 2013 Nov; 347():f6415. PubMed ID: 24231273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Felix-trial. Double-blind randomization of interspinous implant or bony decompression for treatment of spinal stenosis related intermittent neurogenic claudication.
    Moojen WA; Arts MP; Brand R; Koes BW; Peul WC
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2010 May; 11():100. PubMed ID: 20507568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. IPD without bony decompression versus conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: 2-year results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
    Moojen WA; Arts MP; Jacobs WC; van Zwet EW; van den Akker-van Marle ME; Koes BW; Vleggeert-Lankamp CL; Peul WC;
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Oct; 24(10):2295-305. PubMed ID: 25586759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interspinous process devices versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: cost-utility analysis.
    van den Akker-van Marle ME; Moojen WA; Arts MP; Vleggeert-Lankamp CL; Peul WC;
    Spine J; 2016 Jun; 16(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25452018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.
    Strömqvist BH; Berg S; Gerdhem P; Johnsson R; Möller A; Sahlstrand T; Soliman A; Tullberg T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):1436-42. PubMed ID: 23403549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-year results of interspinous spacer (X-Stop) implantation in 175 patients with neurologic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kuchta J; Sobottke R; Eysel P; Simons P
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18(6):823-9. PubMed ID: 19387698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Superion interspinous process spacer for intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis: two-year results from a randomized controlled FDA-IDE pivotal trial.
    Patel VV; Whang PG; Haley TR; Bradley WD; Nunley PD; Davis RP; Miller LE; Block JE; Geisler FH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Mar; 40(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 25494323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Postacchini R; Ferrari E; Cinotti G; Menchetti PP; Postacchini F
    Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical analysis following lumbar interspinous devices implant: where we are and where we go.
    Grasso G; Giambartino F; Iacopino DG
    Spinal Cord; 2014 Oct; 52(10):740-3. PubMed ID: 24912549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Benyamin RM; Staats PS; MiDAS Encore I
    Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Review of Emerging Evidence for Utilization of a Percutaneous Interspinous Process Decompression Device to Treat Symptomatic Lumbar Adjacent-Segment Degeneration.
    Deer TR; Sayed D; Malinowski MN; Rowe JJ; Jameson JB; Liang K; Sclafani JA
    Pain Med; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 2):S9-S13. PubMed ID: 31808531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Machado GC; Ferreira PH; Yoo RI; Harris IA; Pinheiro MB; Koes BW; van Tulder MW; Rzewuska M; Maher CG; Ferreira ML
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 11(11):CD012421. PubMed ID: 27801521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interspinous spacer decompression (X-STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative disk disease: a multicenter study with a minimum 3-year follow-up.
    Puzzilli F; Gazzeri R; Galarza M; Neroni M; Panagiotopoulos K; Bolognini A; Callovini G; Agrillo U; Alfieri A
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2014 Sep; 124():166-74. PubMed ID: 25064150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does an interspinous device (Coflex) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients.
    Richter A; Schütz C; Hauck M; Halm H
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Feb; 19(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 19967546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results.
    Zucherman JF; Hsu KY; Hartjen CA; Mehalic TF; Implicito DA; Martin MJ; Johnson DR; Skidmore GA; Vessa PP; Dwyer JW; Puccio ST; Cauthen JC; Ozuna RM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jun; 30(12):1351-8. PubMed ID: 15959362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Procedure for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication: 2-Year Results of MiDAS ENCORE.
    Staats PS; Chafin TB; Golovac S; Kim CK; Li S; Richardson WB; Vallejo R; Wahezi SE; Washabaugh EP; Benyamin RM;
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2018 Oct; 43(7):789-794. PubMed ID: 30199512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of the preliminary safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive interspinous process device APERIUS(®) in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with symptomatic neurogenic intermittent claudication.
    Van Meirhaeghe J; Fransen P; Morelli D; Craig NJ; Godde G; Mihalyi A; Collignon F
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Dec; 21(12):2565-72. PubMed ID: 22565799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical outcomes and quality of life 1 year after open microsurgical decompression or implantation of an interspinous stand-alone spacer.
    Sobottke R; Röllinghoff M; Siewe J; Schlegel U; Yagdiran A; Spangenberg M; Lesch R; Eysel P; Koy T
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2010 Aug; 53(4):179-83. PubMed ID: 21132610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decompression alone vs. decompression plus fusion for claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Thomas K; Faris P; McIntosh G; Manners S; Abraham E; Bailey CS; Paquet J; Cadotte D; Jacobs WB; Rampersaud YR; Manson NA; Hall H; Fisher CG
    Spine J; 2019 Oct; 19(10):1633-1639. PubMed ID: 31195133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is There Still a Role for Interspinous Spacers in the Management of Neurogenic Claudication?
    Ravindra VM; Ghogawala Z
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2017 Jul; 28(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 28600006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.