BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

671 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24231580)

  • 1. Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients older than 65 years.
    Kleweno C; Morgan J; Redshaw J; Harris M; Rodriguez E; Zurakowski D; Vrahas M; Appleton P
    J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Jul; 28(7):391-7. PubMed ID: 24231580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2).
    Boone C; Carlberg KN; Koueiter DM; Baker KC; Sadowski J; Wiater PJ; Nowinski GP; Grant KD
    J Orthop Trauma; 2014 May; 28(5):e96-e100. PubMed ID: 24751609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Helical Blade Versus Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Hip Fractures With Cephalomedullary Devices: Incidence of Failure and Atypical "Medial Cutout".
    Chapman T; Zmistowski B; Krieg J; Stake S; Jones CM; Levicoff E
    J Orthop Trauma; 2018 Aug; 32(8):397-402. PubMed ID: 30035756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nails for Fixation of Stable Versus Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures at a Level 1 Trauma Center.
    Hulet DA; Whale CS; Beebe MJ; Rothberg DL; Gililland JM; Zhang C; Presson AP; Stuart AR; Kubiak EN
    Orthopedics; 2019 Mar; 42(2):e202-e209. PubMed ID: 30668883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does Computer-assisted Surgery Improve Lag Screw Placement During Cephalomedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures?
    Kuhl M; Beimel C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Sep; 478(9):2132-2144. PubMed ID: 32496321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment of pertrochanteric fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2): long versus short cephalomedullary nailing.
    Hou Z; Bowen TR; Irgit KS; Matzko ME; Andreychik CM; Horwitz DS; Smith WR
    J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Jun; 27(6):318-24. PubMed ID: 22955331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complications of short versus long cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric femur fractures, minimum 1 year follow-up.
    Vaughn J; Cohen E; Vopat BG; Kane P; Abbood E; Born C
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 May; 25(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 25337958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Which Fixation Device is Preferred for Surgical Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures in the United States? A Survey of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
    Niu E; Yang A; Harris AH; Bishop J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3647-55. PubMed ID: 26208608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does modern nail geometry affect positioning in the distal femur of elderly patients with hip fractures? A comparison of otherwise identical intramedullary nails with a 200 versus 150 cm radius of curvature.
    Collinge CA; Beltran CP
    J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Jun; 27(6):299-302. PubMed ID: 23287751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk Factors Associated With Cephalomedullary Nail Cutout in the Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures.
    Ciufo DJ; Zaruta DA; Lipof JS; Judd KT; Gorczyca JT; Ketz JP
    J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Nov; 31(11):583-588. PubMed ID: 28827502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does Size Matter for Cephalomedullary Nails in Geriatric Intertrochanteric Fractures?
    Rinehart DB; O'Neill DE; Liu JW; Sanders DT
    J Orthop Trauma; 2021 Jun; 35(6):329-332. PubMed ID: 33079832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Femoral shortening after surgical treatment of trochanteric fractures in nongeriatric patients.
    Platzer P; Thalhammer G; Wozasek GE; Vécsei V
    J Trauma; 2008 Apr; 64(4):982-9. PubMed ID: 18404065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective randomized study comparing two cephalomedullary nails for elderly intertrochanteric fractures: Zimmer natural nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation II.
    Shin YS; Chae JE; Kang TW; Han SB
    Injury; 2017 Jul; 48(7):1550-1557. PubMed ID: 28433451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Periprosthetic fracture rate after short and long hip nails: Analysis of a regional health database.
    Larose G; Tufescu T; Graham C
    Injury; 2022 Jun; 53(6):2195-2198. PubMed ID: 35341598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cephalomedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.
    Chua IT; Rajamoney GN; Kwek EB
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2013 Dec; 21(3):308-12. PubMed ID: 24366790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures.
    Vallier HA; Cureton BA; Patterson BM
    J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Dec; 25(12):736-41. PubMed ID: 21904230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nails for Pertrochanteric Hip Fracture.
    Frisch NB; Nahm NJ; Khalil JG; Les CM; Guthrie ST; Charters MA
    Orthopedics; 2017 Mar; 40(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 27874910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is a Cephalomedullary Nail Durable Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Peritrochanteric Disease?
    Chafey DH; Lewis VO; Satcher RL; Moon BS; Lin PP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2392-2401. PubMed ID: 30299285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of life after a subtrochanteric fracture: a prospective cohort study on 87 elderly patients.
    Ekström W; Németh G; Samnegård E; Dalen N; Tidermark J
    Injury; 2009 Apr; 40(4):371-6. PubMed ID: 19232590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reverse Oblique and Transverse Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures Treated With the Long Cephalomedullary Nail.
    Irgit K; Richard RD; Beebe MJ; Bowen TR; Kubiak E; Horwitz DS
    J Orthop Trauma; 2015 Sep; 29(9):e299-304. PubMed ID: 25909765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.