These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24231629)
41. Evolution of cochlear implant arrays result in changes in behavioral and physiological responses in children. Gordin A; Papsin B; James A; Gordon K Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):908-15. PubMed ID: 19730148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Electrically evoked ABR through cochlear implant in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder]. Lalayants MR; Chugunova TI; Bakhshinyan VV; Tavartkiladze GA Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2022; 87(2):4-9. PubMed ID: 35605265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. OPA1-related auditory neuropathy: site of lesion and outcome of cochlear implantation. Santarelli R; Rossi R; Scimemi P; Cama E; Valentino ML; La Morgia C; Caporali L; Liguori R; Magnavita V; Monteleone A; Biscaro A; Arslan E; Carelli V Brain; 2015 Mar; 138(Pt 3):563-76. PubMed ID: 25564500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Audiogram Configuration, Molecular Etiology, and Outcome of Cochlear Implantation in Postlingual Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder. Kim Y; Han JJ; Oh J; Han JH; Kim MY; Jung J; Choi JY; Choi BY Otol Neurotol; 2023 Aug; 44(7):e471-e478. PubMed ID: 37278166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users. Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies. Han DM; Chen XQ; Zhao XT; Kong Y; Li YX; Liu S; Liu B; Mo LY Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception. Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response. He S; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 20418771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception. Herrmann BS; Brown MC; Eddington DK; Hancock KE; Lee DJ Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 25437141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Outcomes of Cochlear Implant Recipient With ANSD: Intra and Post Operative Findings, Progress in Audition and Speech Skills. Penumaka MS; Sreerama S; Raju D; Appa Rao S; Nagabathula V Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Jun; 76(3):2746-2754. PubMed ID: 38883447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Analysis of speech perception outcomes among patients receiving cochlear implants with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. Dean C; Felder G; Kim AH Otol Neurotol; 2013 Dec; 34(9):1610-4. PubMed ID: 24080979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children. Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: A multicenter study on auditory performance and speech production outcomes. Daneshi A; Mirsalehi M; Hashemi SB; Ajalloueyan M; Rajati M; Ghasemi MM; Emamdjomeh H; Asghari A; Mohammadi S; Mohseni M; Mohebbi S; Farhadi M Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():12-16. PubMed ID: 29605339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Mismatch negativity: a tool for the assessment of stimuli discrimination in cochlear implant subjects. Wable J; van den Abbeele T; Gallégo S; Frachet B Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 111(4):743-51. PubMed ID: 10727926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Predictors of cochlear implant outcomes in pediatric auditory neuropathy: A matched case-control study. Jafari Z; Fitzpatrick EM; Schramm DR; Rouillon I; Koravand A PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0304316. PubMed ID: 38809896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Toward a method of achieving balanced stimulation of bilateral auditory nerves: Evidence from children receiving matched and unmatched bilateral cochlear implants simultaneously. Tsai P; Wisener N; Papsin BC; Cushing SL; Gordon KA Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108445. PubMed ID: 35104716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Peripheral and Central Contributions to Cortical Responses in Cochlear Implant Users. Scheperle RA; Abbas PJ Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):430-40. PubMed ID: 25658747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants. Hughes ML; Laurello SA Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():116-129. PubMed ID: 28633960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children With Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder (ANSD). Nassiri AM; Yawn RJ; Brown CL; O'Malley MR; Bennett ML; Labadie RF; Haynes DS; Rivas A Otol Neurotol; 2018 Oct; 39(9):e810-e816. PubMed ID: 30199499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Auditory and speech performance in cochlear implanted ANSD children. Alzhrani F; Yousef M; Almuhawas F; Almutawa H Acta Otolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 139(3):279-283. PubMed ID: 30947614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]