These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24231629)

  • 61. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
    Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
    Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Perception of Hearing Aid-Processed Speech in Individuals with Late-Onset Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.
    Mathai JP; Appu S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):815-23. PubMed ID: 26554487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The Effects of GJB2 or SLC26A4 Gene Mutations on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve in Children.
    Luo J; Xu L; Chao X; Wang R; Pellittieri A; Bai X; Fan Z; Wang H; He S
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):194-207. PubMed ID: 31124793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Speech perception in nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds.
    Smoorenburg GF; Willeboer C; van Dijk JE
    Audiol Neurootol; 2002; 7(6):335-47. PubMed ID: 12401965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
    Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Electrically evoked late latency response using single electrode stimulation and its relation to speech perception among paediatric cochlear implant users.
    Saravanan P; Devi N; Geetha C
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2024; 18():1441854. PubMed ID: 39345947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Electrically evoked auditory cortical responses elicited from individually fitted stimulation parameters in cochlear implant users.
    Callejón-Leblic MA; Barrios-Romero MM; Kontides A; Sánchez-Gómez S; Beynon AJ
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Jul; 62(7):650-658. PubMed ID: 35477333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Loudness perception and late auditory evoked potentials in adult cochlear implant users.
    Hoppe U; Rosanowski F; Iro H; Eysholdt U
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 11409789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Electrode discrimination and speech perception in young children using cochlear implants.
    Dawson PW; McKay CM; Busby PA; Grayden DB; Clark GM
    Ear Hear; 2000 Dec; 21(6):597-607. PubMed ID: 11132786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy.
    Holden LK; Skinner MW; Holden TA; Demorest ME
    Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):463-76. PubMed ID: 12411779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
    Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The Sensitivity of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve to Amplitude Modulation Cues Declines With Advanced Age.
    Riggs WJ; Vaughan C; Skidmore J; Conroy S; Pellittieri A; Carter BL; Stegman CJ; He S
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1358-1372. PubMed ID: 33795616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Patients With TMTC2 -Associated Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Auditory Neuropathy/Auditory Dys-Synchrony.
    North L; Olivier M; Runge CL
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Jul; 45(6):e478-e482. PubMed ID: 38769084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users.
    Mathew R; Undurraga J; Li G; Meerton L; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Vickers D
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():86-101. PubMed ID: 28826636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Rate of neural recovery in implanted children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.
    Fulmer SL; Runge CL; Jensen JW; Friedland DR
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Feb; 144(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 21493430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Pitch adaptation patterns in bimodal cochlear implant users: over time and after experience.
    Reiss LA; Ito RA; Eggleston JL; Liao S; Becker JJ; Lakin CE; Warren FM; McMenomey SO
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e23-34. PubMed ID: 25319401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The relationship between electrically evoked compound action potential and speech perception: a study in cochlear implant users with short electrode array.
    Kim JR; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Kim LS
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1041-8. PubMed ID: 20634770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.