198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24232068)
1. First clinical experiences with a direct acoustic cochlear stimulator in comparison to preoperative fitted conventional hearing aids.
Busch S; Kruck S; Spickers D; Leuwer R; Hoth S; Praetorius M; Plinkert PK; Mojallal H; Schwab B; Maier H; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Dec; 34(9):1711-8. PubMed ID: 24232068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study on speech in noise understanding with a direct acoustic cochlear implant in subjects with severe to profound mixed hearing loss.
Lenarz T; Verhaert N; Desloovere C; Desmet J; D'hondt C; González JC; Kludt E; Macías AR; Skarżyński H; Van de Heyning P; Vyncke C; Wasowski A
Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(3):164-74. PubMed ID: 24556905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicenter study with a direct acoustic cochlear implant.
Lenarz T; Zwartenkot JW; Stieger C; Schwab B; Mylanus EA; Caversaccio M; Kompis M; Snik AF; D'hondt C; Mojallal H
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1215-25. PubMed ID: 23921930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel implantable hearing system with direct acoustic cochlear stimulation.
Häusler R; Stieger C; Bernhard H; Kompis M
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):247-56. PubMed ID: 18259077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of sound processing strategies for osseointegrated bone conduction implants in mixed hearing loss: multiple-channel nonlinear versus single-channel linear processing.
Desmet JB; Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Lambrechts P; Hol MK; Mylanus EA; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):598-603. PubMed ID: 23615167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss.
Ihler F; Volbers L; Blum J; Matthias C; Canis M
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 24448279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hearing performance with 2 different high-power sound processors for osseointegrated auditory implants.
Kurz A; Caversaccio M; Kompis M
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):604-10. PubMed ID: 23652327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicenter Clinical Trial of Vibroplasty Couplers to Treat Mixed/Conductive Hearing Loss: First Results.
Zahnert T; Löwenheim H; Beutner D; Hagen R; Ernst A; Pau HW; Zehlicke T; Kühne H; Friese N; Tropitzsch A; Lüers JC; Mlynski R; Todt I; Hüttenbrink KB
Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(4):212-222. PubMed ID: 27351868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Objective and subjective results of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone conduction hearing implant.
Alzhrani F
Saudi Med J; 2019 Aug; 40(8):797-801. PubMed ID: 31423516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss.
Mojallal H; Schwab B; Hinze AL; Giere T; Lenarz T
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 25735204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a new powerful bone-anchored hearing system: a comparison study.
Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Hol MK; Mylanus EA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 23886427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hearing Aid Treatment for Patients with Mixed Hearing Loss. Part II: Speech Recognition in Comparison to Direct Acoustic Cochlear Stimulation.
Wardenga N; Snik AFM; Kludt E; Waldmann B; Lenarz T; Maier H
Audiol Neurootol; 2020; 25(3):133-142. PubMed ID: 32007992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fitting range of the BAHA Cordelle.
Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
Int J Audiol; 2006 Aug; 45(8):429-37. PubMed ID: 17005485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Audiological and subjective benefit results in bone-anchored hearing device users.
Boleas-Aguirre MS; Bulnes Plano MD; de Erenchun Lasa IR; Ibáñez Beroiz B
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 22472615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.
Streitberger C; Perotti M; Beltrame MA; Giarbini N
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
