These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24233192)

  • 1. The researcher and the consultant: a dialogue on null hypothesis significance testing.
    Stang A; Poole C
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 28(12):939-44. PubMed ID: 24233192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The researcher and the consultant: from testing to probability statements.
    Hamra GB; Stang A; Poole C
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 30(9):1003-8. PubMed ID: 26108655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In support of null hypothesis significance testing.
    Mogie M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Feb; 271 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S82-4. PubMed ID: 15101426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review of issues about null hypothesis Bayesian testing.
    Tendeiro JN; Kiers HAL
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):774-795. PubMed ID: 31094544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing.
    Masson ME
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):679-90. PubMed ID: 21302025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. P value and the theory of hypothesis testing: an explanation for new researchers.
    Biau DJ; Jolles BM; Porcher R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 468(3):885-92. PubMed ID: 19921345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters.
    Grzybowski A; Mianowany M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy.
    Nickerson RS
    Psychol Methods; 2000 Jun; 5(2):241-301. PubMed ID: 10937333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A logical analysis of null hypothesis significance testing using popular terminology.
    McNulty R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):244. PubMed ID: 36123631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The continuing misuse of null hypothesis significance testing in biological anthropology.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):236-245. PubMed ID: 29345299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP.
    Kelter R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):142. PubMed ID: 32503439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Dilemma of null hypothesis in ecological hypothesis's experiment test.].
    Li J
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2016 Jun; 27(6):2031-2038. PubMed ID: 29737714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. P > .05: The incorrect interpretation of "not significant" results is a significant problem.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Aug; 172(4):521-527. PubMed ID: 32570289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The frequentist implications of optional stopping on Bayesian hypothesis tests.
    Sanborn AN; Hills TT
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):283-300. PubMed ID: 24101570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The null hypothesis significance test in health sciences research (1995-2006): statistical analysis and interpretation.
    Silva-Ayçaguer LC; Suárez-Gil P; Fernández-Somoano A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 May; 10():44. PubMed ID: 20482841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Moving college health research forward: Reconsidering our reliance on statistical significance testing.
    Barry AE; Valdez D; Goodson P; Szucs L; Reyes JV
    J Am Coll Health; 2019 Apr; 67(3):181-188. PubMed ID: 29952723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
    Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian alternatives for common null-hypothesis significance tests in psychiatry: a non-technical guide using JASP.
    Quintana DS; Williams DR
    BMC Psychiatry; 2018 Jun; 18(1):178. PubMed ID: 29879931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of Bayesian posterior significance and effect size indices for the two-sample t-test to support reproducible medical research.
    Kelter R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):88. PubMed ID: 32321438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.