These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24234041)
1. Testing the limits of optimality: the effect of base rates in the Monty Hall dilemma. Herbranson WT; Wang S Learn Behav; 2014 Mar; 42(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 24234041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are birds smarter than mathematicians? Pigeons (Columba livia) perform optimally on a version of the Monty Hall Dilemma. Herbranson WT; Schroeder J J Comp Psychol; 2010 Feb; 124(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 20175592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Further investigation of the Monty Hall Dilemma in pigeons and rats. Stagner JP; Zentall TR Behav Processes; 2015 Mar; 112():14-21. PubMed ID: 25452075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Monty Hall dilemma in pigeons: effect of investment in initial choice. Stagner JP; Rayburn-Reeves R; Zentall TR Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Oct; 20(5):997-1004. PubMed ID: 23430792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Learning how to "make a deal": human (Homo sapiens) and monkey (Macaca mulatta) performance when repeatedly faced with the Monty Hall Dilemma. Klein ED; Evans TA; Schultz NB; Beran MJ J Comp Psychol; 2013 Feb; 127(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 22746157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Choice behavior of pigeons (Columba livia), college students, and preschool children (Homo sapiens) in the Monty Hall dilemma. Mazur JE; Kahlbaugh PE J Comp Psychol; 2012 Nov; 126(4):407-20. PubMed ID: 22582816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Monty Hall dilemma with pigeons: No, you choose for me. Zentall TR; Case JP; Collins TL Learn Behav; 2015 Sep; 43(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 25772336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Brain activities associated with learning of the Monty Hall Dilemma task. Hirao T; Murphy TI; Masaki H Psychophysiology; 2017 Sep; 54(9):1359-1369. PubMed ID: 28480973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new version of the Monty Hall Dilemma with unequal probabilities. Granberg D Behav Processes; 1999 Nov; 48(1-2):25-34. PubMed ID: 24897560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The collider principle in causal reasoning: why the Monty Hall dilemma is so hard. Burns BD; Wieth M J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):434-49. PubMed ID: 15355148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Within-trial contrast: The effect of probability of reinforcement in training. Gipson CD; Miller HC; Alessandri JJ; Zentall TR Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 19607889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rats' preferences in the suboptimal choice procedure: Evaluating the impact of reinforcement probability and conditioned inhibitors. Alba R; Rodríguez W; Martínez M; Orduña V Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():574-582. PubMed ID: 29689334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do pigeons prefer information in the absence of differential reinforcement? Zentall TR; Stagner JP Learn Behav; 2012 Dec; 40(4):465-75. PubMed ID: 22367755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Suboptimal Choice in Pigeons: Stimulus Value Predicts Choice over Frequencies. Smith AP; Bailey AR; Chow JJ; Beckmann JS; Zentall TR PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159336. PubMed ID: 27441394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Matching-to-sample in pigeons: in the absence of sample memory, sample frequency is a better predictor of comparison choice than the probability of reinforcement for comparison choice. DiGan KA; Zentall TR Learn Behav; 2007 Nov; 35(4):242-51. PubMed ID: 18047222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reasoning and choice in the Monty Hall Dilemma (MHD): implications for improving Bayesian reasoning. Tubau E; Aguilar-Lleyda D; Johnson ED Front Psychol; 2015; 6():353. PubMed ID: 25873906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cognitive flexibility and dual processing in pigeons: Temporal and contextual control of midsession reversal. MacDonald H; Roberts WA J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 29469583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence for a magnitude effect in probability discounting with pigeons. Grace RC; McLean AP J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 26301612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term behavioral sensitization to apomorphine is independent of conditioning and increases conditioned pecking, but not preference, in pigeons. Anselme P; Edeş N; Tabrik S; Güntürkün O Behav Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 336():122-134. PubMed ID: 28859998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]