These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24234160)

  • 1. Potential and probable pathological gamblers: Where do the differences lie?
    Dubé D; Freeston MH; Ladouceur R
    J Gambl Stud; 1996 Dec; 12(4):419-30. PubMed ID: 24234160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the SOGS an accurate measure of pathological gambling among children, adolescents and adults?
    Ladouceur R; Bouchard C; Rhéaume N; Jacques C; Ferland F; Leblond J; Walker M
    J Gambl Stud; 2000; 16(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 14634319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese.
    Tang CS; Wu AM; Tang JY; Yan EC
    J Gambl Stud; 2010 Mar; 26(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 19680794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alcohol's effects on video lottery terminal (VLT) play among probable pathological and non-pathological gamblers.
    Ellery M; Stewart SH; Loba P
    J Gambl Stud; 2005; 21(3):299-324. PubMed ID: 16134010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychometric Properties of the South Oaks Gambling Screen Revised for Adolescents in Chinese Adolescent Gamblers.
    Zhou H; Chen JH; Ling H; Tong KK; Wu AMS
    Int J Public Health; 2022; 67():1605182. PubMed ID: 36466009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Sensation seeking in a French population of horse betting gamblers: comparison between pathological and regular].
    Bonnaire C; Varescon I; Bungener C
    Encephale; 2007 Oct; 33(5):798-804. PubMed ID: 18357851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A pilot study of problem gambling among student online gamblers: mood states as predictors of problematic behavior.
    Matthews N; Farnsworth B; Griffiths MD
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2009 Dec; 12(6):741-5. PubMed ID: 19788379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparisons between the South Oaks Gambling Screen and a DSM-IV-based interview in a community survey of problem gambling.
    Cox BJ; Enns MW; Michaud V
    Can J Psychiatry; 2004 Apr; 49(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 15147024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DSM-IV and the South Oaks Gambling Screen: diagnosing and assessing pathological gambling in Turkey.
    Duvarci I; Varan A; Coşkunol H; Ersoy MA
    J Gambl Stud; 1997; 13(3):193-206. PubMed ID: 12913386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Reliability and validity of the modified Japanese version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)].
    Kido M; Shimazaki T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Feb; 77(6):547-52. PubMed ID: 17447464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of perceived control and overconfidence in pathological gambling.
    Goodie AS
    J Gambl Stud; 2005; 21(4):481-502. PubMed ID: 16311878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association between posttreatment gambling behavior and harm in pathological gamblers.
    Weinstock J; Ledgerwood DM; Petry NM
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2007 Jun; 21(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 17563138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gambling problems among Lebanese adults: Arabic-Language version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) scale validation and correlates.
    Haddad P; Roukoz R; Akel M; Hallit S
    BMC Psychol; 2022 Feb; 10(1):18. PubMed ID: 35105378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Problematic and pathologic gambling in Hungary: the Hungarian version and use of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS-HU)].
    Gyollai A; Urbán R; Kun B; Paksi B; Arnold P; Balázs H; Kökönyei G; Oláh A; Demetrovics Z
    Psychiatr Hung; 2011; 26(4):230-40. PubMed ID: 22058255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characteristics of Treatment Seeking Finnish Pathological Gamblers: Baseline Data from a Treatment Study.
    Lahti T; Halme J; Pankakoski M; Sinclair D; Alho H
    Int J Ment Health Addict; 2013 Jun; 11(3):307-314. PubMed ID: 23710159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical measures vs. perceived gambling severity among youth: why adolescent problem gamblers fail to seek treatment.
    Hardoon K; Derevensky JL; Gupta R
    Addict Behav; 2003 Jul; 28(5):933-46. PubMed ID: 12788266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concordance between the SOGS-RA and the DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling among youth.
    Ladouceur R; Ferland F; Poulin C; Vitaro F; Wiebe J
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2005 Sep; 19(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 16187805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Psychopathology in online pathological gamblers: a preliminary study].
    Barrault S; Varescon I
    Encephale; 2012 Apr; 38(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 22516274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using the Rasch model to evaluate the South Oaks Gambling Screen for use with nonpathological gamblers.
    Strong DR; Breen RB; Lesieur HR; Lejuez CW
    Addict Behav; 2003 Oct; 28(8):1465-72. PubMed ID: 14512069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual, family, and peer correlates of adolescent gambling.
    Langhinrichsen-Rohling J; Rohde P; Seeley JR; Rohling ML
    J Gambl Stud; 2004; 20(1):23-46. PubMed ID: 14973396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.