These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24234245)

  • 1. Retrospective comparison of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms.
    Bao PQ; Mazirka PO; Watkins KT
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2014 Apr; 18(4):682-9. PubMed ID: 24234245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy as minimally invasive surgery for periampullary tumors: a comparison of short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Mendoza AS; Han HS; Yoon YS; Cho JY; Choi Y
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2015 Dec; 22(12):819-24. PubMed ID: 26455716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.
    Chen K; Pan Y; Liu XL; Jiang GY; Wu D; Maher H; Cai XJ
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):120. PubMed ID: 29169337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Yin SM; Liu YW; Liu YY; Yong CC; Wang CC; Li WF; Yeh CH
    BMC Surg; 2021 Jan; 21(1):60. PubMed ID: 33494734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive surgical approach versus open procedure for pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang S; Shi N; You L; Dai M; Zhao Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(50):e8619. PubMed ID: 29390259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy.
    Kim HS; Kim H; Kwon W; Han Y; Byun Y; Kang JS; Choi YJ; Jang JY
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1675-1681. PubMed ID: 32277354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes Following Selective Application of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Malignancies.
    Delitto D; Luckhurst CM; Black BS; Beck JL; George TJ; Sarosi GA; Thomas RM; Trevino JG; Behrns KE; Hughes SJ
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 Jul; 20(7):1343-9. PubMed ID: 27142633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity-matched Study From a National Cohort of Patients.
    Nassour I; Wang SC; Christie A; Augustine MM; Porembka MR; Yopp AC; Choti MA; Mansour JC; Xie XJ; Polanco PM; Minter RM
    Ann Surg; 2018 Jul; 268(1):151-157. PubMed ID: 28486387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with benign and malignant periampullary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.
    Podda M; Gerardi C; Di Saverio S; Marino MV; Davies RJ; Pellino G; Pisanu A
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2390-2409. PubMed ID: 32072286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expanding laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy to pancreatic-head and periampullary malignancy: major findings based on systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chen K; Liu XL; Pan Y; Maher H; Wang XF
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):102. PubMed ID: 29969999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Getting Started with Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is It Worth It?
    Liang S; Jayaraman S
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Sep; 25(9):712-9. PubMed ID: 26375771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wrapping double-mattress anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy can significantly reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula rate compared with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy in open surgery: An analysis of a propensity score-matched sample.
    Kiguchi G; Sugioka A; Uchida Y; Yoshikawa J; Nakauchi M; Kojima M; Tanahashi Y; Takahara T; Yasuda A; Suda K; Kato Y; Uyama I
    Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101577. PubMed ID: 33887674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing Short-term and Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy Across Low and High Volume Centers.
    Torphy RJ; Friedman C; Halpern A; Chapman BC; Ahrendt SS; McCarter MM; Edil BH; Schulick RD; Gleisner A
    Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 29771723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.
    Qin H; Qiu J; Zhao Y; Pan G; Zeng Y
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104274. PubMed ID: 25119463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Totally laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: A propensity score matching analysis of short-term outcomes.
    Mazzola M; Giani A; Crippa J; Morini L; Zironda A; Bertoglio CL; De Martini P; Magistro C; Ferrari G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Mar; 47(3 Pt B):674-680. PubMed ID: 33176959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: changing the management of ampullary neoplasms.
    Chapman BC; Gleisner A; Ibrahim-Zada I; Overbey DM; Paniccia A; Meguid C; Brauer B; Gajdos C; McCarter MD; Schulick RD; Edil BH
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):915-922. PubMed ID: 28779245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal bile duct cancer: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis of outcomes.
    Lee W; Song KB; Hong S; Park Y; Kwak BJ; Jun E; Hwang DW; Kim S; Lee JH; Kim SC
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):881-890. PubMed ID: 36018360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The clinical implication of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Uijterwijk BA; Kasai M; Lemmers DHL; Chinnusamy P; van Hilst J; Ielpo B; Wei K; Song KB; Kim SC; Klompmaker S; Jang JY; Herremans KM; Bencini L; Coratti A; Mazzola M; Menon KV; Goh BKP; Qin R; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Aug; 408(1):311. PubMed ID: 37581763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: A comprehensive review.
    Wang M; Cai H; Meng L; Cai Y; Wang X; Li Y; Peng B
    Int J Surg; 2016 Nov; 35():139-146. PubMed ID: 27664556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial.
    de Graaf N; Emmen AMLH; Ramera M; Björnsson B; Boggi U; Bruna CL; Busch OR; Daams F; Ferrari G; Festen S; van Hilst J; D'Hondt M; Ielpo B; Keck T; Khatkov IE; Koerkamp BG; Lips DJ; Luyer MDP; Mieog JSD; Morelli L; Molenaar IQ; van Santvoort HC; Sprangers MAG; Ferrari C; Berkhof J; Maisonneuve P; Abu Hilal M; Besselink MG;
    Trials; 2023 Oct; 24(1):665. PubMed ID: 37828593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.