BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24234337)

  • 1. Statistical power of latent growth curve models to detect quadratic growth.
    Diallo TM; Morin AJ; Parker PD
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Jun; 46(2):357-71. PubMed ID: 24234337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the power of multivariate latent growth curve models to detect correlated change.
    Hertzog C; Lindenberger U; Ghisletta P; Oertzen Tv
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Sep; 11(3):244-52. PubMed ID: 16953703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Monte-Carlo estimation of effect size distortion due to significance testing.
    Bradley MT; Smith D; Stoica G
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):837-42. PubMed ID: 12509183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Type I error rates and power analyses for single-point sensitivity measures.
    Rotello CM; Masson ME; Verde MF
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):389-401. PubMed ID: 18372758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size estimation for heterogeneous growth curve models with attrition.
    Vallejo G; Ato M; Fernández MP; Livacic-Rojas PE
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Jun; 51(3):1216-1243. PubMed ID: 29934696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Required sample size to detect the mediated effect.
    Fritz MS; Mackinnon DP
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Mar; 18(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 17444920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structural equation models of latent interactions: evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction.
    Marsh HW; Wen Z; Hau KT
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):275-300. PubMed ID: 15355150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of methods for estimating quadratic effects in nonlinear structural equation models.
    Harring JR; Weiss BA; Hsu JC
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):193-214. PubMed ID: 22429193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation.
    Arend MG; Schäfer T
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 30265048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing Spurious Interaction Effects in Structural Equation Modeling: A Cautionary Note.
    Harring JR; Weiss BA; Li M
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Oct; 75(5):721-738. PubMed ID: 29795838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18157920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longitudinal design considerations to optimize power to detect variances and covariances among rates of change: simulation results based on actual longitudinal studies.
    Rast P; Hofer SM
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Mar; 19(1):133-54. PubMed ID: 24219544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the robustness of repeated measures analyses: the case of small sample sizes and nonnormal data.
    Oberfeld D; Franke T
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):792-812. PubMed ID: 23184532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Power analysis for idiographic (within-subject) clinical trials: Implications for treatments of rare conditions and precision medicine.
    Tueller S; Ramirez D; Cance JD; Ye A; Wheeler AC; Fan Z; Hornik C; Ridenour TA
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4175-4199. PubMed ID: 36526885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.
    Enders CK
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 11778677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reexamining Nonlinear Structural Equation Modeling Procedures: The Effect of Parallel and Congeneric Measures.
    Rdz-Navarro K; Alvarado JM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(6):645-61. PubMed ID: 26717124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
    Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing dependent correlations.
    Wilcox RR; Tian T
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 18318411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longitudinal Assessment Design and Statistical Power for Detecting an Intervention Impact.
    Petras H
    Prev Sci; 2016 Oct; 17(7):819-29. PubMed ID: 27106693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.