These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24235215)

  • 1. The impact of broiler production system practices on consumer perceptions of animal welfare.
    de Jonge J; van Trijp HC
    Poult Sci; 2013 Dec; 92(12):3080-95. PubMed ID: 24235215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dutch Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Broiler Welfare.
    Mulder M; Zomer S
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2017; 20(2):137-154. PubMed ID: 28166413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of demographic factors and information sources on United States consumer perceptions of animal welfare.
    McKendree MG; Croney CC; Widmar NJ
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Jul; 92(7):3161-73. PubMed ID: 24962533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Belgian citizens' and broiler producers' perceptions of broiler chicken welfare in Belgium versus Brazil.
    Vanhonacker F; Tuyttens FAM; Verbeke W
    Poult Sci; 2016 Jul; 95(7):1555-1563. PubMed ID: 26976912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding consumers' perceptions towards Iberian pig production and animal welfare.
    García-Gudiño J; Blanco-Penedo I; Gispert M; Brun A; Perea J; Font-I-Furnols M
    Meat Sci; 2021 Feb; 172():108317. PubMed ID: 32980720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of performance, health and welfare aspects between commercially housed hatchery-hatched and on-farm hatched broiler flocks.
    de Jong IC; Gunnink H; van Hattum T; van Riel JW; Raaijmakers MMP; Zoet ES; van den Brand H
    Animal; 2019 Jun; 13(6):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 30370892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What Difference Does a Visit Make? Changes in Animal Welfare Perceptions after Interested Citizens Tour a Dairy Farm.
    Ventura BA; von Keyserlingk MA; Wittman H; Weary DM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154733. PubMed ID: 27243965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Buying higher welfare poultry products? Profiling Flemish consumers who do and do not.
    Vanhonacker F; Verbeke W
    Poult Sci; 2009 Dec; 88(12):2702-11. PubMed ID: 19903971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attitudes of meat consumers in Mexico and Spain about farm animal welfare: A cross-cultural study.
    Estévez-Moreno LX; María GA; Sepúlveda WS; Villarroel M; Miranda-de la Lama GC
    Meat Sci; 2021 Mar; 173():108377. PubMed ID: 33308897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consumer perception versus scientific evidence about alternatives for manual catching of broilers in Belgium.
    Delezie E; Verbeke W; De Tavernier J; Decuypere E
    Poult Sci; 2007 Feb; 86(2):413-9. PubMed ID: 17234859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The price of good welfare: Does informing consumers about what on-package labels mean for animal welfare influence their purchase intentions?
    Cornish AR; Briley D; Wilson BJ; Raubenheimer D; Schlosberg D; McGreevy PD
    Appetite; 2020 May; 148():104577. PubMed ID: 31904389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mid-term financial impact of animal welfare improvements in Dutch broiler production.
    Gocsik E; Lansink AG; Saatkamp HW
    Poult Sci; 2013 Dec; 92(12):3314-29. PubMed ID: 24235244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mexican consumers' perceptions and attitudes towards farm animal welfare and willingness to pay for welfare friendly meat products.
    Miranda-de la Lama GC; Estévez-Moreno LX; Sepúlveda WS; Estrada-Chavero MC; Rayas-Amor AA; Villarroel M; María GA
    Meat Sci; 2017 Mar; 125():106-113. PubMed ID: 27940228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing attitudes toward farm animal welfare: a national survey of animal science faculty members.
    Heleski CR; Mertig AG; Zanella AJ
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Sep; 82(9):2806-14. PubMed ID: 15446498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consumer attitudes towards animal welfare and their willingness to pay.
    Bozzo G; Barrasso R; Grimaldi CA; Tantillo G; Roma R
    Vet Ital; 2019 Dec; 55(4):289-297. PubMed ID: 31642310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Willingness to pay and moral stance: The case of farm animal welfare in Germany.
    Frey UJ; Pirscher F
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202193. PubMed ID: 30106999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are views towards egg farming associated with Brazilian and Chilean egg consumers' purchasing habits?
    Lemos Teixeira D; Larraín R; Hötzel MJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203867. PubMed ID: 30265672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior.
    de Lima VA; Ceballos MC; Gregory NG; Da Costa MJRP
    Poult Sci; 2019 Oct; 98(10):4282-4289. PubMed ID: 31152676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Economic, ecological, and social performance of conventional and organic broiler production in the Netherlands.
    Bokkers EA; de Boer IJ
    Br Poult Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(5):546-57. PubMed ID: 19904633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of a commercial broiler enrichment programme with or without natural light on behaviour and other welfare indicators.
    de Jong IC; Gunnink H
    Animal; 2019 Feb; 13(2):384-391. PubMed ID: 30008274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.