These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24236495)
1. Comparison of three instruments to assess changes of motor impairment in acute hemispheric stroke: the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS), the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS). Seki M; Hase K; Takahashi H; Liu M Disabil Rehabil; 2014; 36(18):1549-54. PubMed ID: 24236495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychometric properties of the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS). Liu M; Chino N; Tuji T; Masakado Y; Hase K; Kimura A Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2002 Dec; 16(4):339-51. PubMed ID: 12462765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke. Masiero S; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Longer versus shorter daily durations of electrical stimulation during task-specific practice in moderately impaired stroke. Page SJ; Levin L; Hermann V; Dunning K; Levine P Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Feb; 93(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 22289227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spontaneous Recovery of Upper Extremity Motor Impairment After Ischemic Stroke: Implications for Stem Cell-Based Therapeutic Approaches. Delavaran H; Aked J; Sjunnesson H; Lindvall O; Norrving B; Kokaia Z; Lindgren A Transl Stroke Res; 2017 Aug; 8(4):351-361. PubMed ID: 28205065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone mineral density in patients with stroke: relationship with motor impairment and functional mobility. Schnitzer TJ; Harvey RL; Nack SH; Supanwanid P; Maskala-Streff L; Roth E Top Stroke Rehabil; 2012; 19(5):436-43. PubMed ID: 22982831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke. Lin JH; Hsu MJ; Sheu CF; Wu TS; Lin RT; Chen CH; Hsieh CL Phys Ther; 2009 Aug; 89(8):840-50. PubMed ID: 19556333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rasch validation and predictive validity of the action research arm test in patients receiving stroke rehabilitation. Chen HF; Lin KC; Wu CY; Chen CL Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Jun; 93(6):1039-45. PubMed ID: 22420887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is the long form of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale more responsive than the short form in patients with stroke? Chen KL; Chen CT; Chou YT; Shih CL; Koh CL; Hsieh CL Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 May; 95(5):941-9. PubMed ID: 24491466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in motor recovery between upper and lower limbs: does stroke subtype make the difference? Paci M; Nannetti L; Casavola D; Lombardi B Int J Rehabil Res; 2016 Jun; 39(2):185-7. PubMed ID: 27096715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: efficacy for patients with minimal upper-extremity motor ability. Bonifer NM; Anderson KM; Arciniegas DB Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 86(9):1867-73. PubMed ID: 16181956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation between the action research arm test and the box and block test of upper extremity function in stroke patients. Chanubol R; Wongphaet P; Ot NC; Chira-Adisai W; Kuptniratsaikul P; Jitpraphai C J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Apr; 95(4):590-7. PubMed ID: 22612016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Responsiveness of two upper extremity function instruments for stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation. Hsueh IP; Hsieh CL Clin Rehabil; 2002 Sep; 16(6):617-24. PubMed ID: 12392336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. Rabadi MH; Rabadi FM Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jul; 87(7):962-6. PubMed ID: 16813784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Upper-extremity functional electric stimulation-assisted exercises on a workstation in the subacute phase of stroke recovery. Kowalczewski J; Gritsenko V; Ashworth N; Ellaway P; Prochazka A Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 88(7):833-9. PubMed ID: 17601461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effective targets for constraint-induced movement therapy for patients with upper-extremity impairment after stroke. Koyama T; Sano K; Tanaka S; Hatanaka T; Domen K NeuroRehabilitation; 2007; 22(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 17971619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity of the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement scale in acute rehabilitation: a comparison with the functional independence measure and stroke impact scale-16. Ward I; Pivko S; Brooks G; Parkin K PM R; 2011 Nov; 3(11):1013-21. PubMed ID: 22108228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of conventional therapy, intensive therapy and modified constraint-induced movement therapy to improve upper extremity function after stroke. Wang Q; Zhao JL; Zhu QX; Li J; Meng PP J Rehabil Med; 2011 Jun; 43(7):619-25. PubMed ID: 21603848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The NIHSS supplementary motor scale: a valid tool for multidisciplinary recovery trials. Leira EC; Coffey CS; Jorge RE; Morton SM; Froehler MT; Davis PH; Adams HP Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 36(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 23921195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The responsiveness and correlation between Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Motor Status Scale, and the Action Research Arm Test in chronic stroke with upper-extremity rehabilitation robotic training. Wei XJ; Tong KY; Hu XL Int J Rehabil Res; 2011 Dec; 34(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 22044987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]